Crater Corp. v. Lucent Tech., Inc., 535 U.S. 1073 (2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Crater Corp. v. Lucent Tech., Inc., 535 U.S. 1073 (2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Vantage Associates, Inc. v. United States (uscfc, 2003-08-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Vantage Associates, Inc. v. United States
Fed. Cl. · 2003 · signal: see also · confidence low
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 325 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); see also Crater Corp. v. Lucent Tech., Inc., 255 F.3d 1361, 1366 (Fed.Cir.), reh’g denied (2001), cert. denied, 535 U.S. 1073 , 122 S.Ct. 1952 , 152 L.Ed.2d 854 (2002); Trilogy Communications, Inc. v. Times Fiber Communications, Inc., 109 F.3d 739, 741 (Fed.Cir.) (quoting Conroy v. Reebok Int’l.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Crater Corp.
v.
Lucent Technologies, Inc., Et Al.
01-932.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 13, 2002.
535 U.S. 1073
2002 U.S. LEXIS 3520
Published

C. A. Fed. Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to file District Court order under seal granted. Certiorari denied. Justice O’Connor and Justice Scalia took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.