North Carolina State Bar v. Whitted, 354 S.E.2d 501 (N.C. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
North Carolina State Bar v. Whitted, 354 S.E.2d 501 (N.C. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Arrowood v. N.C. Department of Health & Human Services (ncctapp, 2000-09-19)
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Arrowood v. N.C. Department of Health & Human Services
N.C. Ct. App. · 2000 · confidence medium
Crews v. Parker, 319 N.C. 354, 358 , 354 S.E.2d 501, 504 (1987) (citation omitted).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Hill v. Hill
N.C. Ct. App. · 1996 · confidence medium
Crews v. Parker, 319 N.C. 354, 357-359 , 354 S.E.2d 501, 504-505 (1987).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Jackson County Ex Rel. Child Support Enforcement Agency Ex Rel. Smoker v. Smoker (2×)
N.C. Ct. App. · 1994 · confidence medium
Crews v. Parker, 319 N.C. 354, 358 , 354 S.E.2d 501, 504 (1987).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) MISS. DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES v. Barnett
Miss. · 1993 · confidence medium
Crews v. Parker, 319 N.C. 354 , 354 S.E.2d 501, 505 (1987) a grandmother was allowed to intervene in a settlement between the state and the father of her grandchild for reimbursement for funds she expended before the child became a recipient of AFDC.
discussed Cited "see" Scamardella v. Illiano (2×)
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See North Carolina State Bar v. Whitted, 82 N.C.App. 531 , 347 S.E.2d 60, 64 (1986), aff'd, 319 N.C. 398 , 354 S.E.2d 501 (1987); In re Guardianship of Lauderdale, 15 Wash.App. 321 , 549 P.2d 42, 45-46 (1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The North Carolina State Bar
v.
Earl Whitted, Jr.
581A86.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Apr 7, 1987.
354 S.E.2d 501
1987 N.C. LEXIS 1942
A. Root Edmonson, for plaintiff appellee. , Irving Joyner, Hulse & Hulse, by Herbert B. Hulse, for defendant appellant.
Frye, Whichard.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

Justices FRYE and WHICHARD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.