green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.6 score
“while a finding that the prior felony conviction qualifies as 'aggravated' is a fact that can increase the defendant's sentence beyond the initially prescribed maximum sentence, the plain language of apprendi excepts the fact of prior convictions from its holding”
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Robert D. Strong, Appellant/cross-Appellee
while a finding that the prior felony conviction qualifies as 'aggravated' is a fact that can increase the defendant's sentence beyond the initially prescribed maximum sentence, the plain language of apprendi excepts the fact of prior convictions from its holding
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jorge Amezcua-Campos
See United States v. Kempis-Bonola, 287 F.3d 699, 702-03 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 914 , 123 S.Ct. 295 , 154 L.Ed.2d 196 (2002).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. A.Villanueva-Basurto
See United States v. Kempis-Bonola, 287 F.3d 699, 701-02 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 295 , 154 L.Ed.2d 196 (2002).
Hill
v.
Ghee
v.
Ghee
02-5420.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 2002.
Published
Citer courts: Eighth Circuit (1)
HILL
v.
GHEE ET AL.
No. 02-5420.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 7, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 38 Fed. Appx. 218.