Brown v. Bryan Cnty., OK, 117 F.3d 239 (5th Cir. 1997). · Go Syfert
Search
Brown v. Bryan Cnty., OK, 117 F.3d 239 (5th Cir. 1997). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Brown v. Bryan Cnty., OK, 235 F.3d 944 (5th Cir. 2000)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 240 “for consideration in conformity with the opinion of the supreme court.”3 citing cases3 citing courts quote it
  • Brown v. Bryan Cnty., OK, 235 F.3d 944 (5th Cir. 2000).published 2 cites
    Specifically, the district court had to decide whether liability against the County could be upheld on the basis of the jury’s finding that the County had a policy of not training its officers. 117 F.3d 239, 240 (5th Cir. 1997).
  • Brown v. Bryan Cnty., 219 F.3d 450 (5th Cir. 2000).published 2 cites
    Specifically, the district court had to decide whether liability against the County could be upheld on the basis of the jury’s finding that the County had a policy of not training its officers. 117 F.3d 239, 240 (5th Cir.1997).
  • Jill Brown v. Bryan Cnty., Ok, 219 F.3d 450 (5th Cir. 2000).published 2 cites
    Specifically, the district court had to decide whether liability against the County could be upheld on the basis of the jury's finding that the County had a policy of not training its officers. 117 F.3d 239, 240 (5th Cir. 1997).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jill BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant,
v.
BRYAN COUNTY, OK, Et Al., Defendants, Bryan County, OK and Stacey Burns, Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees
93-5376.
Docket on CourtListener (RECAP)
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Jul 8, 1997.
Published opinion
117 F.3d 239
1997 WL 370787
John Kermit Hill, Duke Weldon Walker, Mill, Ellis & Walker, Sherman, TX, for Jill Brown., Wallace B. Jefferson, Sharon E. Callaway, Crofts, Callaway & Jefferson, San Antonio, TX, Jack Gordon Kennedy, Kennedy, Min-shew, Campbell & Morris, Sherman, TX, for Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.
Emilio, Garza, Reynaldo, Wiener.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

[*240] ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

ORDER:

The above ease, which can be found at 67 F.3d 1174 was reversed by the Supreme Court. Our judgment was vacated and the same was remanded. We in turn remand the same to the District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, from whence it came, for consideration in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court.