Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Tart
See Anthony , 354 N.C. at 427 , 555 S.E.2d at 592 . **82 Even when a reviewing court determines that a trial court erred in failing to intervene ex mero motu , a new trial will be granted only if "the remarks were of such a magnitude that their inclusion prejudiced defendant, and thus should have been excluded by the trial court." Jones , 355 N.C. at 131 , 558 S.E.2d at 106 (citations omitted). "[T]o warrant a new trial, the prosecutor's remarks must have perverted or contaminated the trial such that they rendered the proceedings fundamentally unfair." State v. Mann , 355 N.C. 294 , 307-08, 56…
cited
Cited "see"
Joe Dale Johnson v. State
See Jaubert v. State, 74 S.W.3d 1, 4 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1005 , 123 S.Ct. 495 , 154 L.Ed.2d 403 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see"
Loredo v. State
(2×)
See Jaubert v. State, 65 S.W.3d 73, 81-82 (Tex.App.-Waco 2000), rev'd on other grounds by 74 S.W.3d 1 (Tex.Crim.App.), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1005 , 123 S.Ct. 495 , 154 L.Ed.2d 403 (2002) (finding the difference between "open file" policy and the notice request under article 37.07 section 3(g) is that under article 37.07 section 3(g), there is a continuing duty on the State to notify defendant of all extraneous offense evidence it intends to introduce). [4] The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed our Jaubert decision finding ineffective assistance of counsel because the extraneous offense…
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Tirado
See State v. Mann, 355 N.C. 294 , 313, 560 S.E.2d 776 , 788 (when the victim was alive when forced into the trunk of *545 her car and the evidence supported a reasonable inference that she "tried desperately, but futilely, to free herself as she anticipated the moment when defendant would end her life," the trial court committed no error in submitting the (e)(9) aggravating circumstance), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1005 , 123 S.Ct. 495 , 154 L.Ed.2d 403 (2002).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brice v. Denton
(2×)
See, eg., Jaubert v. State, 65 S.W.3d 73, 82 (Tex.App.-Waco 2000), rev’d, 74 S.W.3d 1 (Tex.Crim.App.), cer t. denied, 537 U.S. 1005 , 123 S.Ct. 495 , 154 L.Ed.2d 403 (2002); Phillips v. State, 964 S.W.2d 735, 737 (Tex.App.-Waco 1998), rev’d, 992 S.W.2d 491 (Tex.Crim.App.1999). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McCoy
v.
Louisiana
v.
Louisiana
02-6082.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 4, 2002.
Published
MCCOY
v.
LOUISIANA.
No. 02-6082.
Supreme Court of United States.
November 4, 2002.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF LOUISIANA.
2
4th Jud. Dist. Ct. La., Ouachita Parish. Certiorari denied.