green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
8.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 2004 ·
…eligibility for 212(c) relief is not a liberty or property interest warranting due process protection, and therefore the immigration judge's error in failing to explain the deportee's eligibility does not rise to the level of fundamental unfairness.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Ricardo Aguirre-Tello
(2×)
eligibility for 212(c) relief is not a liberty or property interest warranting due process protection, and therefore the immigration judge's error in failing to explain the deportee's eligibility does not rise to the level of fundamental unfairness.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Trevino-Zaragoza
See United, States v. Lopez-Ortiz, 313 F.3d 225, 230-31 (5th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1135 , 123 S.Ct. 922 , 154 L.Ed.2d 827 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Madrid-Manriquez
See United States v. Lopez-Ortiz, 313 F.3d 225, 230 (5th Cir. 2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1135 , 123 S.Ct. 922 , 154 L.Ed.2d 827 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sanchez-Parra
See United States v. Lopez-Ortiz, 313 F.3d 225, 230 (5th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1135 , 123 S.Ct. 922 , 154 L.Ed.2d 827 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lepore
See United States v. Lopez-Ortiz, 313 F.3d 225, 231 (5th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1135 , 123 S.Ct. 922 , 154 L.Ed.2d 827 (2003) (holding that Section 212(c) relief is not a right protected by due process “because it is available within the broad discretion of the Attorney General”); United States v. Roque-Espinoza, 338 F.3d 724, 729 (7th Cir.2003) (opining that “it would be hard to show that the loss of a chance at wholly discretionary relief is the kind of deprivation of liberty or property that the due process clause is designed to protect”); Oguejiofor v. Attorney General, …
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Macias-Cruz
See United States v. Lopez-Ortiz, 313 F.3d 225, 229 (2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1135 , 123 S.Ct. 922 , 154 L.Ed.2d 827 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Marquez-Urquidi
See United States v. Lopez-Ortiz, 313 F.3d 225, 230 (5th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1135 , 123 S.Ct. 922 , 154 L.Ed.2d 827 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gomez-Lira
See United States v. Lopez-Ortiz, 313 F.3d 225, 228 (5th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1135 , 123 S.Ct. 922 , 154 L.Ed.2d 827 (2003).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sotelo-Mendoza
See United States v. Lopez-Ortiz, 313 F.3d 225, 230-31 (5th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1135 , 123 S.Ct. 922 , 154 L.Ed.2d 827 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Singh v. Mukasey
See, e.g., U.S. v. Lopez-Ortiz, 313 F.3d 225, 231 (5th Cir.2002), cert. denied, 537 U.S. 1135 , 123 S.Ct. 922 , 154 L.Ed.2d 827 (2003); Smith v. Ashcroft, 295 F.3d 425, 430 (4th Cir.200d2); Oguejiofor v. Attorney General, 277 F.3d 1305, 1309 (11th Cir.2002); Huicochea-Gomez v. INS, 237 F.3d 696, 700 (6th Cir.2001); Escudero-Corona v. INS, 244 F.3d 608, 615 (8th Cir.2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lopez-Ortiz
v.
United States
v.
United States
02-7628.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 2003.
537 U.S. 1135
2003 U.S. LEXIS 426
Cited by 39 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Tenth Circuit (2)
LOPEZ-ORTIZ
v.
UNITED STATES.
No. 02-7628.
Supreme Court of United States.
January 13, 2003.
1
CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT.
2
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 313 F. 3d 225.