Ramirez-Burgos v. United States, 537 U.S. 1167 (2003). · Go Syfert
Ramirez-Burgos v. United States, 537 U.S. 1167 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“by deciding that ramirez would have been unable to establish plain error on direct review he thus cannot establish that his appellate counsel was ineffective under the second prong of strickland . . . .”
26 citation events (26 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Hunt v. State (alacrimapp, 2005-11-23)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Hunt v. State
Ala. Crim. App. · 2005 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
by deciding that ramirez would have been unable to establish plain error on direct review he thus cannot establish that his appellate counsel was ineffective under the second prong of strickland . . . .
cited Cited "see" Ramirez-Burgos v. United States
D.P.R. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ramírez-Burgos v. United States, 537 U.S. 1167 , 123 S.Ct. 981 , 154 L.Ed.2d 907 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ramirez-Burgos
v.
United States
02-8035.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 21, 2003.
537 U.S. 1167
2003 U.S. LEXIS 881

537 U.S. 1167

RAMIREZ-BURGOS
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 02-8035.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 21, 2003.

1

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT.

2

C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 313 F. 3d 23.