Redic v. Dretke, Dir., Texas Dep't of Crim. Just., Corr. Institutions Div., 540 U.S. 894 (2003).

Redic v. Dretke, Dir., Texas Dep't of Crim. Just., Corr. Institutions Div., 540 U.S. 894 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite

green Positive treatment 10.0 score

10 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.

Strongest positive: State v. Daniel B. (conn, 2019-03-05)

Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗

discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Daniel B. (2×)

Conn. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low

Although, as a general matter, "[w]hat constitutes a substantial step in any given case is a question of fact"; (internal quotation marks omitted) State v. Osbourne , 138 Conn. App. 518 , 528, 53 A.3d 284 , cert. denied, 307 Conn. 937 , 56 A.3d 716 (2012) ; the court must exercise its gatekeeping function to ensure that the defendant's conduct is "strongly corroborative of the actor's criminal **32 purpose...." General Statutes § 53a-49 (b) ; see also United States v. Crowley , 318 F.3d 401 , 415 (2d Cir.) (noting that "the 'strongly corroborative' language" is used in Model Penal Code to ins…

discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Daniel B.

Conn. · 2019 · signal: see also · confidence low

Although, as a general matter, ‘‘[w]hat constitutes a substantial step in any given case is a question of fact’’; (internal quotation marks omitted) State v. Osbourne, 138 Conn. App. 518, 528 , 53 A.3d 284 , cert. denied, 307 Conn. 937 , 56 A.3d 716 (2012); the court must exercise its gatekeeping function to ensure that the defendant’s con- duct is ‘‘strongly corroborative of the actor’s criminal purpose. . . .’’ General Statutes § 53a-49 (b); see also United States v. Crowley, 318 F.3d 401, 415 (2d Cir.) (noting that ‘‘the ‘strongly corroborative’ language’’ i…

examined Cited "see, e.g." State v. Bellamy (7×)

Conn. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low

See, e.g., State v. Fuller , 158 Conn.App. 378 , 384-85, 119 A.3d 589 (2015) ; see also United States v. Crowley , 318 F.3d 401 , 411 (2d Cir.) (concluding that defense counsel's failure to seek instruction on renunciation represented reasonable strategic choice not to suggest to jury that defendant began with but later abandoned criminal purpose), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 894 , 124 S.Ct. 239 , 157 L.Ed.2d 171 (2003).