Hill v. Doc's Transfer & Warehouse, Inc, 540 U.S. 924 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Hill v. Doc's Transfer & Warehouse, Inc, 540 U.S. 924 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“section 2244(d) does not permit the reinitiation of the limitations period that has ended before the state petition was filed”
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Curiel v. Fleker (cacd, 2008-04-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Curiel v. Fleker
C.D. Cal. · 2008 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
section 2244(d) does not permit the reinitiation of the limitations period that has ended before the state petition was filed
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hill
v.
Doc's Transfer & Warehouse, Inc
03-5733.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 6, 2003.
540 U.S. 924
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 57%
Citer courts: C.D. California (1)

540 U.S. 924

HILL
v.
DOC'S TRANSFER & WAREHOUSE, INC.

No. 03-5733.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 6, 2003.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 11th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 61 Fed. Appx. 670.