green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
State of Texas v. Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo
See generally Texas v. Ysleta del Sur Pueblo (Ysleta II), 69 Fed.Appx. 659 (5th Cir.) (unpublished), cer t. denied, 540 U.S. 985 , 124 S.Ct. 497 , 157 L.Ed.2d 377 (2003). 13 .
cited
Cited "see"
Gibler v. Barnhart
See Littlejohn v. United States, 321 F.3d 915, 923 (9th Cir.) (describing the requirements for issue preclusion), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 985 , 124 S.Ct. 486 , 157 L.Ed.2d 377 (2003).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Cote v. Murphy
See, e.g., Allison v. Snyder, 332 F.3d 1076, 1079 (7th Cir.) (holding that, in light of Wolfish , “[d]etails *8 such as double celling add nothing” to due process claim brought by civilly-committed sexually dangerous persons in Illinois), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 985 , 124 S.Ct. 486 , 157 L.Ed.2d 377 (2003).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo
v.
Texas
v.
Texas
03-461.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 3, 2003.
540 U.S. 985
2003 U.S. LEXIS 8061
Cited by 10 opinions | Published
YSLETA DEL SUR PUEBLO ET AL.
v.
TEXAS.
No. 03-461.
Supreme Court of United States.
November 3, 2003.
1
Appeal from the C. A. 5th Cir.
2
Certiorari denied. Reported below: 69 Fed. Appx. 659.