Welch v. Mercer, 302 S.E.2d 629 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983). · Go Syfert
Welch v. Mercer, 302 S.E.2d 629 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Barnes v. Wall (gactapp, 1991-09-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Barnes v. Wall
Ga. Ct. App. · 1991 · confidence medium
Welch v. Mercer, 165 Ga. App. 776, 777 ( 302 SE2d 629 ) (1983). “ ‘The burden is on the party alleging error to show it affirmatively by the record.’ ” (Citation omitted.) Gillespie v. Gillespie, 259 Ga. 838 ( 388 SE2d 688 ) (1990).
discussed Cited "see" Frank v. State (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Welch v. Mercer, 165 Ga. App. 776 ( 302 SE2d 629 ) (1983). *166 2.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Coffee v. Silver (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Welch v. Mercer, 165 Ga. App. 776 ( 302 SE2d 629 ) (1983). “ ‘Since in the absence of a transcript or other appropriate substitute, OCGA § 5-6-41 (g), an appellate court is bound to assume that the trial court’s findings are supported by sufficient competent evidence, for there is a presumption in favor of the regularity of all proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction, (cit.), we are constrained to affirm the (judgment).’ [Cit.]” Brown v. Thomas, 191 Ga. App. 679 (1) ( 382 SE2d 656 ) (1989). 2.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
WELCH
v.
MERCER Et Al.
65793.
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Mar 14, 1983.
302 S.E.2d 629
1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2015
Ronald A. Cohen, R. Bruce Warren, for appellant., William C. Sanders, for appellees.
Deen, Banke, Carley.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published
Deen, Presiding Judge.

Welch brings this appeal contending that the trial court erred in giving one of appellee’s requested charges because the evidence did not support such a charge. No transcript is included as a part of the record on appeal. Held:

When appellant has not filed a transcript of the evidence, he is required under OCGA § 5-6-41 (g) (Code Ann. § 6-805) either to produce “... the agreement of the parties that a transcript prepared from recollection is correct or, ‘in case of the inability of the parties to agree as to the correctness of such transcript, the decision of the trial judge thereon shall be final and not subject to review.’ Where the appellant fails to bring up a transcript or otherwise meet his burden of affirmatively showing error by the record, the judgment will not be disturbed. Boswell v. Blease, 150 Ga. App. 846 (259 SE2d 102) (1979).[*777] Where a proposed transcript prepared by the appellant is disapproved by the trial court, this is sufficient to bar it without the necessity of showing that the appellee formally objected to it. Cowart v. Cowart, 236 Ga. 626, 628 (255 SE2d 5) (1976). Where the evidence is not brought before this court by any of the methods provided in [OCGA § 5-6-41 (Code Ann. § 6-805)] the judgment of the trial court on evidentiary matters cannot be reviewed. Jenkins v. Jenkins, 231 Ga. 371 (202 SE2d 52) (1973); Nicholson v. Nicholson, 231 Ga. 760 (204 SE2d 292) (1974).” Burns v. Barnes, 154 Ga. App. 802 (270 SE2d 57) (1980). As a transcript of the evidence is necessary to review an enumeration of error alleging that the evidence did not justify the giving of a charge, we must affirm.

Decided March 14, 1983. Ronald A. Cohen, R. Bruce Warren, for appellant. William C. Sanders, for appellees.

Judgment affirmed.

Banke and Carley, JJ., concur.