Alameda Films, S. A. v. Authors Rights Restoration Corp., Inc., 540 U.S. 1048 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Alameda Films, S. A. v. Authors Rights Restoration Corp., Inc., 540 U.S. 1048 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
31 citation events (31 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Trelles v. Continental Casualty Co. (lactapp, 2017-02-17)
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2003 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Trelles v. Continental Casualty Co.
La. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Laudumiey, 2003-0234 (La. 6/27/03), 849 So.2d 515, 523 , cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1048 , 124 S.Ct. 814 , 157 L.Ed.2d 697 (2003).
discussed Cited "see" Kettey v. Saudi Ministry of Education
D.D.C. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lempert v. Republic of Kazakstan, Ministry of Justice, 223 F.Supp.2d 200, 203 (D.D.C.2002), aff'd, 62 Fed.Appx. 355 (D.C Cir.2003), cert. denied. 540 U.S. 1048 , 124 S.Ct. 820 , 157 L.Ed.2d 697 (2003) (finding that although the parties negotiated over contract terms while plaintiff was in the United States, the court lacked jurisdiction over breach of contract and unjust enrichment claims because “the elements of [plaintiffs] claim that would entitle him to relief [were] his performance and [defendant’s] non-payment, both of which were in Kazakstan.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." City of Houston v. Sherif Chemam and Diann Chemam
Tex. App. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
Combs v. STP Nuclear Operating Co ., 239 S.W.3d 264, 275 (Tex. App.—Austin 2007, pet. denied); see also Long v. Tanner , 170 S.W.3d 752 , 754–55 (Tex. App.—Waco 2005, pet. denied) (“To successfully bring a selective prosecution or enforcement claim, a plaintiff must prove that the government official’s acts were motivated by improper considerations, such as race, religion, or the desire to prevent the exercise of a constitutional right.”) (quoting Beeler v. Rounsavall , 328 F.3d 813, 817 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 540 U.S. 1048 , 124 S. Ct. 820 (2003).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sadhu Singh Hamdad Trust v. Ajit Newspaper Advertising, Marketing & Communications, Inc.
E.D.N.Y · 2007 · signal: see also · confidence low
Aug. 29, 2000) (noting that “[n]o proof of registration is required if the work for which plaintiff seeks protection has been authored in a foreign country covered by an applicable Convention,” and that the Berne Convention is such an applicable convention) (citing 17 U.S.C. § 411 (a)); see also Alameda Films SA de CV v. Authors Rights Restoration Corp., Inc., 331 F.3d 472, 475 (5th Cir.) (noting that when the United States adopted the Uruguay Round Agreement Act, it “eliminated many of the formalities previously required for copyrighting foreign works in the U.S., including registratio…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alameda Films, S. A.
v.
Authors Rights Restoration Corp., Inc.
03-457.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 2003.
540 U.S. 1048
Published

540 U.S. 1048

ALAMEDA FILMS, S. A., ET AL.
v.
AUTHORS RIGHTS RESTORATION CORP., INC., ET AL.

No. 03-457.

Supreme Court of United States.

December 1, 2003.

1

Appeal from the C. A. 5th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied. Reported below: 331 F. 3d 472.