Robles v. Dretke, Dir., Texas Dep't of Crim. Just., Corr. Institutions Div., 540 U.S. 1058 (2003). · Go Syfert
Search
Robles v. Dretke, Dir., Texas Dep't of Crim. Just., Corr. Institutions Div., 540 U.S. 1058 (2003). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
12 citation events (12 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Ingram (connappct, 2011-12-06)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Ingram
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Moody, 77 Conn. App. 197, 217 , 822 A.2d 990 (use of pronoun “I” in argument increases chances that arguments will deteriorate into expressions of personal opinion, but mere use of the pronoun “I” does not constitute improper argument), cert. denied, 264 Conn. 918 , 827 A.2d 707 , cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1058 , 124 S. Ct. 831 , 157 L.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Dawes
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Moody, 77 Conn. App. 197, 217 , 822 A.2d 990 (use of pronoun “I” in argument increases chances that appropriately structured arguments will deteriorate into expressions of personal opinion), cert. denied, 264 Conn. 918 , 827 A.2d 707 , cert. denied, 540 U.S. 1058 , 124 S. Ct. 831 , 157 L.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Felix R.
Conn. · 2015 · signal: see also · confidence low
I submit, ladies and gentlemen, he was trying to deceive and deflect the investigation of this case from the very beginning.’’ (Emphasis added.) 2 See State v. Ceballos, 266 Conn. 364, 367 , 832 A.2d 14 (2003) (reversing judgment on due process grounds due to improper conduct by Pepper during questioning of witnesses and closing argument); State v. Payne, 260 Conn. 446 , 447–49, 797 A.2d 1088 (2002) (reversing judgment under supervisory authority due to improper comments by Pepper during closing argument); State v. Butler, 255 Conn. 828 , 829–30, 769 A.2d 697 (2001) (affirming Appel- l…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robles
v.
Dretke, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
03-6709.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 1, 2003.
540 U.S. 1058
2003 U.S. LEXIS 8765
Published

540 U.S. 1058

ROBLES
v.
DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION.

No. 03-6709.

Supreme Court of United States.

December 1, 2003.

[*~1058–1059]1

Appeal from the C. A. 5th Cir.

2

Certiorari denied.