Veloz v. United States, 541 U.S. 1080 (2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Veloz v. United States, 541 U.S. 1080 (2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“our precedents make clear . . . that the 'statutory maximum' for apprendi purposes is the maximum sentence a judge may impose solely on the basis of the facts reflected in the jury verdict or admitted by the defendant.”
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State of Tennessee v. Andre Davis (tenncrimapp, 2008-11-05)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (verbatim quote) State of Tennessee v. Andre Davis (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
Tenn. Crim. App. · 2008 · signal: see · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence high
our precedents make clear . . . that the 'statutory maximum' for apprendi purposes is the maximum sentence a judge may impose solely on the basis of the facts reflected in the jury verdict or admitted by the defendant.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Veloz
v.
United States
03-10000.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 1, 2004.
541 U.S. 1080
Published

541 U.S. 1080

VELOZ
v.
UNITED STATES.

No. 03-10000.

Supreme Court of United States.

June 1, 2004.

1

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 87 Fed. Appx. 47.