green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Cox v. Curtin
As we stressed in Kyles , “The adjective is important: The question is not whether the defendant would more likely than not have received a different verdict with the evidence, but whether in its absence he received a fair trial, understood as a trial resulting in a verdict worthy of confidence.” Strickler, 527 U.S. at 289-90 , 119 S.Ct. 1936 , 144 L.Ed.2d 286 (quoting Kyles, 514 U.S. at 434 , 115 S.Ct. 1555 , 131 L.Ed.2d 490 ) (emphasis added); accord United States v. Crayton, 357 F.3d 560, 569 (6th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 910 , 124 S.Ct. 2857 , 159 L.Ed.2d 279 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Apanovitch v. Houk
As we stressed in Kyles , “The adjective is important: The question is not whether the defendant would more likely than not have received a different verdict with the evidence, but whether in its absence he received a fair trial, understood as a trial resulting in a verdict worthy of confidence.” Strickler, 527 U.S. at 289-90 , 119 S.Ct. 1936 (quoting Kyles, 514 U.S. at 434 , 115 S.Ct. 1555 ) (emphasis added); accord United States v. Crayton, 357 F.3d 560, 569 (6th Cir.2004), cert. denied, 542 U.S. 910 , 124 S.Ct. 2857 , 159 L.Ed.2d 279 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sanders
See Sanders v. United States, 542 U.S. 911 , 124 S.Ct. 2858 , 159 L.Ed.2d 279 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Decato
v.
Executive Office for United States Attorneys
v.
Executive Office for United States Attorneys
03-10254.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 14, 2004.
542 U.S. 911
2004 U.S. LEXIS 4293
Cited by 8 opinions | Published
DeCATO
v.
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS.
No. 03-10254.
Supreme Court of United States.
June 14, 2004.
1
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.