H. O. Meyer Drilling Co. v. Alton v. Phillips Co., 486 P.2d 1071 (Wash. 1971). · Go Syfert
Search
H. O. Meyer Drilling Co. v. Alton v. Phillips Co., 486 P.2d 1071 (Wash. 1971). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
25 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 1971 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1971 1998 2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
H. O. Meyer Drilling Co., Inc., Respondent,
v.
Alton v. Phillips Co., Inc., Et Al., Petitioners
41610.
Washington Supreme Court.
Jul 1, 1971.
486 P.2d 1071
1971 Wash. LEXIS 615
Lycette, Diamond & Sylvester and John N. Sylvester, for petitioners., Johnson, Jonson & Inslee, James C. Hanken, Carl A. Jonson, and Gerald G. Day, for respondent.
Stafford.
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published

Lead Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this cause we granted a petition to review the decision of the Court of Appeals, as reported in 2 Wn. App. 600,468 P.2d 1008 (1970).

Our decision in Murphy v. Campbell Inv. Co., 79 Wn.2d 417, 486 P.2d 1080 (1971), contemporaneously filed, involves and affirmatively resolves the basic question presented in this action, i.e., whether a contractor’s substantial compliance with the registration requirements of RCW 18.27 (the contractors registration act) satisfies the policy of that statute. The essential facts in the instant case, as well as the determination of the Court of Appeals, are in accord with the Murphy case. Disposition of this cause is, therefore, controlled by Murphy.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

Dissent

Stafford, J.

(dissenting) — The reasons for my dissent have been set forth at length in Murphy v. Campbell Inv. [*432] Co., 79 Wn.2d 417, 486 P.2d 1080 (1971). Nothing will be gained by repeating them in the instant case.

Rosellini, J., concurs with Stafford, J.