Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Wolterbeek's Case
The STANDARDS list the following factors for consideration in imposing sanctions: “(a) the duty violated; (b) the lawyer’s mental state; (c) the.potential or actual injury caused by the lawyer’s misconduct; and (d) the existence of aggravating or mitigating factors.” Standards, supra § 3.0; see Kersey’s Case, 150 N.H. 585, 587 , cert. denied, 125 S. Ct. 97 (2004).
cited
Cited "see"
Reiner's Case
See Kersey’s Case, 150 N.H. 585, 586, cert. denied, 125 S. Ct. 97 (2004).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richmond's Case
The Standards set forth the following factors for courts to consider in imposing sanctions: “(a) the duty violated; (b) the lawyer’s mental state; (c) the potential or actual injury caused by the lawyer’s misconduct; and (d) the existence of aggravating or mitigating factors.” Standards, supra § 3.0; see Kersey’s Case, 150 N.H. 585, 587 , cert. denied, 125 S. Ct. 97 (2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Wilkins
v.
Calbone, Warden
v.
Calbone, Warden
04-5236.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 4, 2004.
Published
WILKINS
v.
CALBONE, WARDEN, ET AL.
No. 04-5236.
Supreme Court of United States.
October 4, 2004.
1
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.