Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
T-Zone Health Inc v. SouthStar Capital LLC
Carolina Winds, 374 S.E.2d at 899, 901 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Sapp v. Ford Motor Co.
(2×)
Carolina Winds Owners' Ass'n, Inc. v. Joe Harden Builder, Inc., 297 S.C. 74, 87 , 374 S.E.2d 897, 905 (Ct.App.1988).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Colleton Preparatory Academy, Inc. v. Hoover Universal, Inc.
(2×)
The South Carolina Court of Appeals originally rejected the Maryland court's analysis in Whiting-Turner in its decision in Carolina Winds Owners’ Ass'n v. Joe Harden Builder, Inc., 297 S.C. 74, 85-88 , 374 S.E.2d 897, 905-06 (Ct.App.1988).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Myrtle Beach Pipeline Corp. v. Emerson Electric Co.
Id. at 377 . 18 See also Carolina Winds Owners’ Ass’n v. Joe Harden Builder, Inc., 297 S.C. 74 , 374 S.E.2d 897, 901 (Ct.App.1988) (“The [economic loss] rule states that an action will not lie in tort for a product defect without a claim of injury to the person or other property of the plaintiff.”) (emphasis added), disapproved on other grounds by Kennedy v. Columbia Lumber & Mfg., 299 S.C. 335 , 384 S.E.2d 730, 734-36 (1989), and overruling recognized by Beachwalk Villas Condominium Ass’n v. Martin, 305 S.C. 144 , 406 S.E.2d 372 (1991).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Kennedy v. Columbia Lumber & Manufacturing Co.
The Court of Appeals characterized this warranty liability as “arising from the construction contract to which the builder is a party, not some subsequent contract of sale to which he is a stranger.” Carolina Winds, 297 S. C. at 84, 374 S. E. (2d) at 903.
cited
Cited "see"
Bennett v. Ford Motor Co.
See Carolina Winds v. Joe Harden Builder, 297 S.C. 74 , 374 S.E.2d 897, 901 (S.C.App.1988) (giving the general rule), overruled by Kennedy v. Columbia Lumber & Mfg.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
J. Frank BARTLETT, III, Respondent
v.
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner
v.
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Jan 3, 1989.
Published
ORDER
The appeal in the above entitled matter is hereby dismissed for failure to timely file the Petition for Writ of Certiorari pursuant to Rule 55, Section 2(C) of the Rules of Practice of this Court.