discussed Cited "but see" Albemarle Corporation & Subsidiaries v. United States But see Chamberlain Grp., Inc. v. Skylink Techs., Inc., 381 F.3d 1178, 1196 (Fed.Cir.2004) (“Though “we do not resort to legislative history to cloud a statutory text that is clear,’ Ratzlaf v. United States, 510 U.S. 135, 147-48 [ 114 S.Ct. 655 , 126 L.Ed.2d 615 ] (1994), we nevertheless recognize that Vords are inexact tools at best, and hence it is essential that we place the words of a statute in their proper context by resort to the legislative history.’” (quoting Tidewater Oil Co. v. United States, 409 U.S. 151, 157 , 93 S.Ct. 408 , 34 L.Ed.2d 375 (1972))), reh’g and reh’g …

discussed Cited "but see" Seven Resorts, Inc. v. United States But see Chamberlain Grp., Inc. v. Skylink Techs., Inc., 381 F.3d 1178, 1196 (Fed.Cir.2004) (“Though ‘we do not resort to legislative history to cloud a statutory text that is clear,’ Ratzlaf v. United States, 510 U.S. 135, 147-48 , 114 S.Ct. 655 , 126 L.Ed.2d 615 (1994), we nevertheless recognize that “words are inexact tools at best, and hence it is essential that we place the words of a statute in their proper context by resort to the legislative history.’” (quoting Tidewater Oil Co. v. United States, 409 U.S. 151, 157 , 93 S.Ct. 408 , 34 L.Ed.2d 375 (1972))), reh’g and reh’g…