Clay v. Roper, Superintendent, Potosi Corr. Ctr., 544 U.S. 1035 (2005). · Go Syfert
Search
Clay v. Roper, Superintendent, Potosi Corr. Ctr., 544 U.S. 1035 (2005). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 5× by 5 distinct cases, last quoted 2006 · …only when the record compels a reversal; the mere fact that the record may support a contrary conclusion is not enough to justify a reversal of the administrative findings. ⚠ not in text
cited 4× by 4 distinct cases, last quoted 2007 · …a finding of fact will be reversed only when the record compels a reversal; the mere fact that the record may support a contrary conclusion is not enough to justify a reversal of the administrative findings. ⚠ not in text
142 citation events (142 in the last 25 years) across 11 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Xiang Yong Wang v. U.S. Attorney General (ca11, 2006-09-06)
Treatment trajectory · 2005 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2005 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Xiang Yong Wang v. U.S. Attorney General
11th Cir. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adefemi v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 1022 , 1027 (11th Cir.2004) (en banc), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1035 , 125 S.Ct. 2245 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1063 (2005).
cited Cited "see" Mauricio Aranzazu Alzate v. U.S. Atty. Gen.
11th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adefemi v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 1022 , 1029 (11th Cir.2004) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. --, 125 S.Ct. 2245 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1063 (2005).
discussed Cited "see" Michael Malak Shenoda v. U.S. Attorney General
11th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adefemi v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 1022 , 1029 (11th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 125 S.Ct. 2245 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1063 (2005) (explaining that we “consider only whether there is substantial evidence for the findings made by the BIA, not whether there is substantial evidence for some other finding that could have been ... made”) (quotation omitted).
discussed Cited "see" Schmitt v. True
E.D. Va. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Matheney v. Anderson, 377 F.3d 740, 747 (7th Cir.2004), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 2252 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1063 (2005); Valdez v. Cockrell, 274 F.3d 941, 954 (5th Cir.2001). *626 The Supreme Court has explained that “[a] state court’s decision is ‘contrary to’ our clearly established law if it ‘applies a rule that contradicts the governing law set forth in our cases’ or if it ‘confronts a set of facts that are materially indistinguishable from a decision of this Court and nevertheless arrives at a result different from our precedent.’ ” Mitchell v. Esparza, 540 U.S. 1…
cited Cited "see" Liliana Maria Diaz v. U.S. Attorney General
11th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Adefemi v. Ashcroft, 386 F.3d 1022 , 1027 (11th Cir. 2004) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 2245 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1063 (2005).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Ralph Eugene Morton, United States of America v. Kenneth Lee Johnson, A.K.A. Kenneth Johnson, Jr.
8th Cir. · 2005 · signal: see · confidence high
See Clay v. Bowersox, 367 F.3d 993, 1000 (8th Cir.2004), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 2246 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1063 , 2005 WL 40898 (U.S. May 16, 2005).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Clay
v.
Roper, Superintendent, Potosi Correctional Center
04-8018.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 16, 2005.
544 U.S. 1035
2005 U.S. LEXIS 3998
Cited by 119 opinions  |  Published

544 U.S. 1035

CLAY
v.
ROPER, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER.

No. 04-8018.

Supreme Court of United States.

May 16, 2005.

1

C. A. 8th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 367 F. 3d 993.