green
Positive treatment
1.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Czarkowski v. Jennings
(2×)
Accord Ferko v. Spisak, 373 Pa. Super. 303, 308 , 541 A.2d 327, 329 (1988) (discussing Rahn as holding that “the abutting lot owners acquired the fee in the streets” and that “the subdivider had divested himself of title to the streets...and had no fee to rededicate.”), aff’d, 522 Pa. 503 , 564 A.2d 157 (1989).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Joseph FERKO and Ann Ferko, his wife, Appellants,
v.
Michael L. SPISAK and Patricia A. Spisak, his wife, and the Borough of North East, Pennsylvania, Rocco J. and Dinah Jo Tomasino, Daniel R. and Elinor Morse, and Robert B. Haslett, Executor of the Estate of Lochner Tenney.
v.
Michael L. SPISAK and Patricia A. Spisak, his wife, and the Borough of North East, Pennsylvania, Rocco J. and Dinah Jo Tomasino, Daniel R. and Elinor Morse, and Robert B. Haslett, Executor of the Estate of Lochner Tenney.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Oct 6, 1989.
Nix, C.J., and Larsen, Flaherty, McDermott, Zappala and Papadakos.
Published
[*504] Eugene J. Brew, Jr., McClure & Miller, Erie, for appellants.
Robert J. Jeffery, Orton, Dunlavey & Jeffery, P.C., North East, for Michael L. and Patricia Spisak.
Cathy M. Lojewski, North East, for other appellees.
Before NIX, C.J., and LARSEN, FLAHERTY, McDERMOTT, ZAPPALA and PAPADAKOS, JJ.
PER CURIAM:
Order affirmed.