green
Positive treatment
6.6 score
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Abee v. Stamm
He cites: Schreckengost v. Kraft, 415 Pa. 567 , 204 A.2d 646, 649 (1964); Deibold v. Sommerville, 207 Pa. Super. 31 , 215 A.2d 313 (1965); Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Staats, 358 Pa. 344 , 57 A.2d 830 (1948); Wermeling v. Shattuck, 366 Pa. 23 , 76 A.2d 406 (1950). 3 The first three cases involved accidents at city intersections; the first two involved injuries to urban pedestrians; the third a collision between vehicles traversing each intersecting street.
discussed
Cited "see"
Matthews, J. v. Batroney, C.
See Schreckengost v. Kraft, 204 A.2d 646 (Pa. Super. 1964) (forfeiture of statutory right-of-way by speeding); and Williams v. Philadelphia Toilet & Laundry Co., 29 A.2d 336 (Pa. Super. 1942) (forfeiture of statutory right-of-way by travelling on wrong side of roadway).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matthews, J. v. Batroney, C.
See Schreckengost v. Kraft, 204 A.2d 646 (Pa. Super. 1964) (forfeiture of statutory right-of-way by speeding); and Williams v. Philadelphia Toilet & Laundry Co., 29 A.2d 336 (Pa. Super. 1942) (forfeiture of statutory right-of-way by travelling on wrong side of roadway).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Schreckengost, Appellant,
v.
Kraft
v.
Kraft
Appeal, 304.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov 10, 1964.
Robert M. Dale, with him J. G. McGill, and Dale and Woodard, for appellants., Leo M. Brewster, for appellee.
Bell, Musmanno, Jones, Cohen, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Opinion
Per Curiam,The opinion of President Judge Breene adequately covers the issue in this case.
Judgments affirmed.
Mr. Justice Eagen dissents.