Treatment trajectory · 1968 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1968
1997
2026
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Faye Wasserman, Defendant-Appellant
v.
Faye Wasserman, Defendant-Appellant
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 18, 1963.
Mr. Oerold Xanengiser argued the cause for the defendant-appellant., Mr.. William, A. O’Brien argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Franlc A. Verga, attorney).
Per Curiam.
Cited by 15 opinions | Published
Pee Cueiam.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Lewis in the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Chief Justice Weinteaub, and Justices Jacobs, Eeancis, Peoctoe, Hall, Schettino and Hane-MAN — 7.
For reversal — None.