neutral
Cited (no substantive treatment)
published
Under Fire
0.8 score
Under fire: who is questioning this case
Citations from separate opinions of courts that could overrule this
case.
This is a warning signal, not a treatment change. The flag color above is unaffected.
Dissent
Frederick Classical Charter Sch., Inc. v. Frederick Cnty. Bd. of Educ., 164 A.3d 285 (Md. 2017)
“The Court of Special Appeals has also explained that an appellate court “examine[s] whether the agency’s decision is in accordance with the law or whether it is arbitrary, illegal, and capricious.” Venter v. Bd. of Educ., 185 Md.App. 648, 664-65 , 972 A.2d 328, 337 , cert. denied, 410 Md. 561 , 979 A.2d 709 (2009) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).”
Cited for
No citing cases on record.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
VENTER
v.
BOARD OF EDUC.
v.
BOARD OF EDUC.
Pet. Docket No. 223.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Jan 1, 2009.
Published opinion
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Petition for writ of certiorari denied.