Swindle v. State, 919 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). · Go Syfert
Search
Swindle v. State, 919 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
32 citation events (32 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: BEACH CLUB TOWERS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CHRIS JONES, Property Appraiser for Escambia County, Florida JANET HOLLEY, Tax Collector for Escambia County, Florida (fladistctapp, 2017-10-30)
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2004 2015 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) BEACH CLUB TOWERS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. CHRIS JONES, Property Appraiser for Escambia County, Florida JANET HOLLEY, Tax Collector for Escambia County, Florida (2×)
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2017 · confidence medium
Accardo, 139 So. 3d at 855-56 (approving Ward v. Brown, 919 So. 2d 462, 463 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Island Resorts Investments, Inc. v. Chris Jones, Property Appraiser etc.
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2016 · confidence medium
Facilities Auth. v. Hartsfield, 698 So.2d 526, 527-30 (Fla.1997) (holding that the appellant/lessee was the equitable owner ‘ of the project because the lessor held legal title only to facilitate the project’s financing, served as a conduit through which lease payments were used to repay the holders of the certificates of participation that financed the project, and -could not make any profit and the appellant could acquire legal title by paying nominal consideration); Ward v. Brown, 919 So.2d 462, 463-65 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (holding that the appellants were the equitable owners of the imp…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Russell v. Southeast Housing, LLC
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2015 · signal: cf. · confidence medium
Cf. Ward v. Brown, 919 So.2d 462, 463 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005) (holding private lessees of government property on long term leases are equitable owners where they “have the right to use or rent the improvements, encumber their interests, transfer their property rights, and realize any appreciation in value from sale or rental income”).
examined Cited as authority (rule) Leonard J. Accardo v. Gregory S. Brown, etc. (3×) also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
Fla. · 2014 · confidence medium
WARD v. BROWN Prior to the case now before us, the taxation of leaseholds at Navarre Beach was dealt with most recently in Ward v. *855 Brown, 919 So.2d 462, 463 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), where the First District Court considered whether the taxpayers bringing the challenge were “equitable owners of the property improvements placed on their leaseholds,” which derived from the lease granted by Escambia County to Santa Rosa County.
discussed Cited "see" Accardo v. Brown
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See Ward v. Brown, 919 So.2d 462, 463 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005), rev. denied, 923 So.2d 1165 (Fla.2006). *800 Following the issuance of Ward , the Santa Rosa County Property Appraiser assessed ad valorem property taxes not only on the improvements located on Appellants’ leaseholds but also on the underlying land.
cited Cited "see" Swindle v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Swindle v. State, 919 So.2d 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Reginald SWINDLE, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
3D04-903.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sep 9, 2004.
919 So. 2d 462
Shevin, Wells and Shepherd.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Reginald Swindle, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, and Steven R. Berger, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SHEVIN, WELLS and SHEPHERD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal stems from a summary denial of a motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In that motion, defendant sought (1) removal of his designation as a sexual predator and (2) removal of certain conditions of probation. For the reasons stated in Espindola v. State, 855 So.2d 1281, 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)(observing that "in the absence of a provision allowing for a hearing to determine whether a defendant presents a danger to the public sufficient to require registration and public notification, the Florida Sexual Predators Act [(FSPA)] violates procedural due process"), we reverse the trial court's ruling as to defendant's designation as a sexual predator. We again certify conflict with the Second District's decision in Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), review granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla.2003). In all other respects, the lower court's ruling is affirmed.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and conflict certified.