Jones v. Singletary, 709 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Jones v. Singletary, 709 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Huffman v. Florida Department of Corrections (fladistctapp, 2008-02-13)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Huffman v. Florida Department of Corrections
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jones v. Singletary, 709 So.2d 656 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Bard v. Wolson, 687 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
cited Cited "see" Zacke v. Moore
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jones v. Singletary, 709 So.2d 656 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Bard v. Wolson, 687 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
cited Cited "see" Adams v. Florida Parole Commission
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See Jones v. Singletary, 709 So.2d 656 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); Bard v. Wolson, 687 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lawrence Lee JONES, Appellant,
v.
Harry K. SINGLETARY, Jr., Appellee.
96-791.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
May 20, 1998.
709 So. 2d 656
1998 WL 251453
Per Curiam.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

Lawrence Lee Jones, appellant, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Joy A. Stubbs, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with Sheley v. Florida Parole Comm'n, 703 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), we treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari, and upon appellee's proper confession of error, we conclude that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law by denying the petition for writ of mandamus without affording petitioner the opportunity to reply to respondent's response[*657] below. See Bard v. Wolson, 687 So.2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). Accordingly, the trial court's order denying the petition for writ of mandamus is quashed, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings.

WOLF, MICKLE and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.