At page 73 orig. proceeding4 citing cases
- Edwards Aquifer Auth. v. Chem. Lime, Ltd., 291 S.W.3d 392 (Tex. 2009).published See, e.g., In re Doe 1, 19 S.W.3d 300, 300 (Tex.2000); Texas Water Comm'n v. Dellana, 849 S.W.2d 808 , 809 n. 1 (Tex. 1993); Davenport v. Garcia, 837 S.W.2d 73, 73 (Tex. 1992). . 19 S.W.3d 346, 349 (Tex.2000). .
- Di Ferrante v. Smith, 940 S.W.2d 843 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1997).publishedReal parties in interest concede mandamus relief is available when a trial judge renders an oral ruling, see Davenport v. Garcia, 837 S.W.2d 73, 73 (Tex.1992), and when a trial judge refuses to act.
- in Re Mark A. Galvan & Mark Galvan, L.L.C., No. 03-06-00008-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Feb. 6, 2006).published(orig. proceeding)
- In Re Doe, 19 S.W.3d 346 (Tex. 2000).published See 940 S.W.2d 86, 87, 94 (Tex.1997); see also, e.g., Davenport v. Garcia, 837 S.W.2d 73, 73 (Tex.1992); Painter v. Shaner, 667 S.W.2d 123, 124 (Tex.1984); Coalson v. City Council of Victoria, 610 S.W.2d 744, 747 (Tex.1980).
At page 77 stating that ―[i]n deciding market value the jury is permitted to consider all of the uses to which the property is reasonably adaptable and for which it is, or in all reasonable probability will become, available within the foreseeable future‖ (emphasis added)4 citing cases
- Crosstex DC Gathering Co., J v. v. Terry Titus Button, Ossie A. Button, T & O Legacy, Ltd., & Sw. Sec., FSB, F/K/A First Sav. Bank, FSB, No. 02-11-00067-CV (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Jan. 24, 2013).published (In deciding market value the jury is permitted to consider all of the uses to which the property is reasonably adaptable and for which it is, or in all reasonable probability will become, available within the foreseeab…)
- Guadalupe-Blanco River Auth. v. Kraft, 39 S.W.3d 264 (Tex. App.—Austin 2001).published (It is then for the jury to decide which evidence to accept and which to reject in deciding the ultimate issue of market value.)
- Travis Cent. Appraisal Dist. v. FM Props. Operating Co., 947 S.W.2d 724 (Tex. App.—Austin 1997).publishedSee Code § 1.04(7); State v. Windham, 837 S.W.2d at 77; State v. Carpenter, 126 Tex. 604 , 89 S.W.2d 979, 980 (Comm'n App.1936).
- Crosstex North Texas Pipeline, L.P., N/K/A Enlink North Texas Pipeline, Lp v. Andrew Gardiner & Shannon Gardiner, 505 S.W.3d 580 (Tex. 2016).publishedSee Windham, 837 S.W.2d at 77 (“If Wind-ham is permitted to present evidence of the market value ... on its theory of the highest and best use of the property, then the State should be allowed to present evidence based on its competing the…
At page 74 cited at this page1 citing case
- Guadalupe-Blanco River Auth. v. Kraft, 77 S.W.3d 805 (Tex. 2002).published See id. at 74. 24 .
At page 76 cited at this page1 citing case
- In re State, 355 S.W.3d 611 (Tex. 2011).published Id. at 76-77 (citations omitted).
Other citing cases
- Joe Behrens v. WTG Gas Transmission Co., No. 03-18-00510-CV (Tex. App.—Austin July 17, 2019).published
- Katherine Elizabeth Williams v. State, 406 S.W.3d 273 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2013).published
- Exxon Pipeline Co. v. Zwahr, 88 S.W.3d 623 (Tex. 2002).published
- In Re Bledsoe, 41 S.W.3d 807 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2001).published
- Guadalupe-Blanco River Auth. v. Marvin Kraft, Sr., No. 03-00-00190-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Jan. 11, 2001).published
- State v. ADSS Props., Inc., 878 S.W.2d 607 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1994).published
- Enbridge G & P (East Texas) L.P. v. Ben Samford & Wife Bette Ann Samford, Cecil Jackson & Wife Michelle Jackson & Sammy Monk, 470 S.W.3d 848 (Tex. App.—Tyler 2015).published
- In Re Perritt, 973 S.W.2d 776 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 1998).published
v.
the Honorable Carolyn GARCIA
ORDER
Relator’s request for emergency relief is granted in part and the writ of mandamus is conditionally granted in part. The trial court is ordered to vacate its oral “gag order” of August 23, 1991 and its Protective Order of September 11, 1991. The remaining issues raised by the petition for writ of mandamus remain under consideration by this court, and opinions will follow this order on all matters raised in the petition for writ of mandamus.
PHILLIPS, C.J., not sitting.