Bulot v. Intracoastal Tubular Servs., Inc., 817 So. 2d 1149 (La. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Bulot v. Intracoastal Tubular Servs., Inc., 817 So. 2d 1149 (La. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, 2014–2015 · …without jurisdiction to affirm, reverse or modify the judgment of the trial court. ✓
19 citation events (19 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Landry (lactapp, 2013-07-31)
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. Landry
La. Ct. App. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bulot v. Intracoastal Tubular Services, Inc., 02-1035 (La.6/14/02), 817 So.2d 1149 .
cited Cited "see" Maloney Cinque, L.L.C. v. Pacific Insurance Co.
La. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bulot v. Intracoastal Tubular Services, Inc., 02-1035 (La.6/14/02), 817 So.2d 1149 .
cited Cited "see" Maloney Cinque, LLC v. Pacific Insurance Company, Ltd.
La. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bulot v. Intracoastal Tubular Services, Inc., 02-1035 (La.6/14/02), 817 So.2d 1149 .
cited Cited "see" Kaem v. Jmc
La. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bulot v. Intracoastal Tubular Services, Inc., 02-1035 (La.6/14/02), 817 So.2d 1149 ; see also Davis v. Jazz Casino Co., 03-0276 (La.6/6/03), 849 So.2d 497 .
cited Cited "see" K.A.E.M. v. J.M.C.
La. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Bulot v. Intracoastal Tubular Services, Inc., 02-1035 (La.6/14/02), 817 So.2d 1149 ; see also Davis v. Jazz Casino Co., 03-0276 (La.6/6/03), 849 So.2d 497 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ursula BULOT, et al.
v.
INTRACOASTAL TUBULAR SERVICES, INC., et al.
2002-CC-1035.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Jun 14, 2002.
817 So. 2d 1149
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published

Granted. The court of appeal denied writs in this case, but went on to affirm the judgment of the trial court. Lacking appellate jurisdiction over this case (as no appeal was filed by the parties) and having declined to exercise its supervisory jurisdiction by denying the writ, the court of appeal was without jurisdiction to affirm, reverse or modify the judgment of the trial court. Accordingly, we strike from the court of appeal's opinion any language purporting to affirm the judgment of the trial court.