Ivey v. Hull & Co., Inc., 458 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Ivey v. Hull & Co., Inc., 458 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
14 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Andrew Pretka v. Kolter City Plaza II, Inc. (ca11, 2013-12-26)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (rule) Andrew Pretka v. Kolter City Plaza II, Inc. (3×)
11th Cir. · 2013 · confidence medium
Id. at 441.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Bruno v. Mona Lisa at Celebration, LLC (In re Mona Lisa at Celebration, LLC)
Bankr. M.D. Fla. · 2012 · confidence medium
Assoc., 458 So.2d 439, 441 (Fla.App.2d Dist.1984) (“Appellant urges that a good faith attempt was made to comply with the Condominium Act, Chapter 718, Florida Statutes, and that the recording error should not be used to provide a windfall to the condominium owners.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Providence Square Ass'n v. Biancardi
Fla. · 1987 · confidence medium
Beach Place Joint Venture v. Beach Place Condominium Association, Inc., 458 So.2d 439, 441 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Almerico v. RLI Ins. Co.
Fla. · 1998 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Ivey [v. Hull & Co., 458 So.2d 439 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)]; AMI Ins.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Thressia IVEY, Appellant,
v.
HULL & COMPANY, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellee.
84-377.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Nov 14, 1984.
458 So. 2d 439
Lehan.
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

Bonnie L. Earley Freeman of Chambers & Salzman, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellant.

Maureen Emmet-Miller of Riden, Watson & Goldstein, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellee.

LEHAN, Judge.

Notwithstanding the well presented argument on behalf of plaintiff we affirm the trial court's judgment for defendant notwithstanding the verdict. Defendant had furnished to the insurance broker who dealt with plaintiff an insurance application blank containing the name of defendant as "Insurance & Reinsurance Intermediaries." Under the facts of this case the broker did not thereby become an agent of defendant or have apparent authority from defendant to issue on behalf of defendant an automobile insurance policy to plaintiff. See AMI Insurance Agency v. Elie, 394 So.2d 1061, 1062 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

Affirmed.

RYDER, C.J., and DANAHY, J., concur.