green
Positive treatment
26.7 score
G Cite
cited 6× by 6 distinct cases, last quoted 2010 ·
…the court must first determine if there is a conflict between the laws of the relevant jurisdictions.
at p. 1150
⚠ not in text
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, 2007–2018 ·
…only if such a conflict exists must the court then determine, pursuant to district of columbia choice of law rules, which jurisdiction has the 'more substantial interest' in the resolution of the issues.
at p. 1150
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002
2014
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 41 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Smartmatic USA Corp. v. Powell
Co. of Can., 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Mimedx Group, Inc. v. Dbw Partners LLC
Co. of Canada, 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Price v. Stryker Corporation
Co. of Canada, 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Katopothis v. Windsor Mount Joy Mutual Insurance Company
Co. of Can., 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002) (citing Greycoat Hanover F St.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Hourani v. Psybersolutions LLC
Co., 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Intelsat USA Sales Corp. v. Juch-Tech, Inc.
Co., 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002))); Eli Lilly & Co. v. Home Ins.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Mar-Jac Poultry, Inc. v. Katz
Co., 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Watson v. Gold N Diamonds, Inc.
Co., 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
American Petroleum Institute v. Technomedia International, Inc.
Co., 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
American Petroleum Institute v. Technomedia International, Inc.
Co., 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Whiting v. Aarp
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Co., 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Whiting v. AARP
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Co., 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
America's Choice, Inc. v. Bienvenu
Co., 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Parnigoni v. ST. COLUMBA'S NURSERY SCHOOL
Co. of Canada, 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Parnigoni v. St. Columba's Nursery School
Co. of Canada, 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Houlahan v. World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools
Co. of Canada, 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Mobile Satellite Communications, Inc. v. Intelsat USA Sales Corp.
Co., 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Mobile Satellite Communication, Inc. v. Intelsat USA Sales Corporation
Co., 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Equipment Corporation of America
Co., 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Equipment Corp. of America
Before applying the District’s choice of law principles, however, “the court must first determine if there is a conflict between the laws of the relevant jurisdictions.” Young Women’s Christian Ass’n v. Allstate Ins. *55 Co., 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Bailey v. J & B TRUCKING SERVICES, INC.
Co., 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
City of Harper Woods Employees' Retirement System Ex Rel. BAE Systems PLC v. Olver
Co., 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002)). 1.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Barbour
Co., 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Flemming, Zulack & Williamson, LLP v. Dunbar
Co. of Canada, 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Carswell v. Air Line Pilots Ass'n Intern.
Co. of Canada, 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Morris v. Buvermo Properties, Inc.
Co., 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Stromberg v. Marriott International, Inc.
Co., 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Jones v. HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Co., 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Wright v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
Co. of Canada, 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002) (citing Eli Lilly & Co. v. Home Ins.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Samra v. Shaheen Business & Investment Group, Inc.
(2×)
Co. of Canada, 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002) (citing Eli Lilly & Co. v. Home Ins.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Youming Jin v. Ministry of State Security
Co. of Canada, 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002); Ideal Elec.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Young Women's Christian Ass'n of the National Capital Area, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co. of Canada
(2×)
Co. of Canada, 275 F.3d 1145, 1148 (D.C.Cir.2002).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Republican National Committee v. Taylor
Co. of Canada, 275 F.3d 1145, 1150 (D.C.Cir.2002).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Young Wmn Chrstn
v.
Allstate Insurance
v.
Allstate Insurance
00-7259.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.
Jan 18, 2002.
275 F.3d 1145
Published
United States Court of Appeals
For The District of Columbia Circuit
No. 00-7259 September Term, 2001 94cv00741
Filed On: January 15, 2002 [650991]
Young Women's Christian Association of the National
Capital Area, Inc., a District of Columbia Non-Profit
Corporation,
Appellant
v.
Allstate Insurance Company of Canada, a Canadian
Corporation, et al.,
Appellees
BEFORE: Ginsburg, Chief Judge; Rogers and Garland, Circuit Judges
O R D E R
It is ORDERED that the court's opinion filed on January 15, 2001 be amended as follows:
The date decided should be amended to reflect January 15, 2002 not January 15, 2001
For The District of Columbia Circuit
No. 00-7259 September Term, 2001 94cv00741
Filed On: January 15, 2002 [650991]
Young Women's Christian Association of the National
Capital Area, Inc., a District of Columbia Non-Profit
Corporation,
Appellant
v.
Allstate Insurance Company of Canada, a Canadian
Corporation, et al.,
Appellees
BEFORE: Ginsburg, Chief Judge; Rogers and Garland, Circuit Judges
O R D E R
It is ORDERED that the court's opinion filed on January 15, 2001 be amended as follows:
The date decided should be amended to reflect January 15, 2002 not January 15, 2001
Per Curiam
FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk
BY: Michael C. McGrail Deputy Clerk