Lane Enter., Inc. v. L.B. Foster Co., 710 A.2d 54 (Pa. 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
Lane Enter., Inc. v. L.B. Foster Co., 710 A.2d 54 (Pa. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 15× by 14 distinct cases, 2001–2020 · 3 courts↑ Rising · …if an issue has not been raised in a post-trial motion, it is waived for appeal purposes. at p. 54 ✓ Topic ↗
136 citation events (113 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Brian, J. v. Springfield, E. (pasuperct, 2016-09-15)
Treatment trajectory · 1998 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1998 2012 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 19 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Brian, J. v. Springfield, E.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
if an issue has not been raised in a post-trial motion, it is waived for appeal purposes.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Brookside Apartments v. Heilman, M.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2015 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
if an issue has not been raised in a post-trial motion, it is waived for appeal purposes.
discussed Cited as authority (quoted) Prime Group Remediation, Inc. v. T. Lomax & Associates, Inc.
pactcomplphilad · 2013 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
pa. r. civ. p.227.1 requires parties to file post-trial motions in order to preserve issues for appeal. if an issue has not been raised in a post-trial motion, it is waived for appeal purposes
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Murat, R. v. Stateside Builders
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2026 · confidence medium
Foster Co., 710 A.2d 54, 54-55 (Pa. 1998) (noting that issues not raised in post-trial motion are waived for appellate review); see also Krystal Development Corp. v. Rose, 704 A.2d 1102, 1103 (Pa. Super. 1997) (explaining no issues preserved for appellate review without timely filed post- trial motions after non-jury trial); see also Pa.R.Civ.P. 227.1(b)(2) (“Except ____________________________________________ 3 We recognize that Appellants participated in the damages trial and filed documents as reflected in the docket and outlined by the trial court above. 4 We find Appellants’ second is…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Dovin, J. v. Honey Brook Golf Club
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2024 · confidence medium
Foster Co., 710 A.2d 54, 54 (Pa. 1998); Pa.R.C.P. 227.1. . . . * * * Furthermore, the instant appeal is procedurally defective as it does not comport with Pa.R.C.P. 227.4, . . . * * * Because Pa.R.C.P. 227.1 requires parties to file post-trial motions in order to preserve issues for appeal; issues not raised in a post- trial motion are waived for appeal purposes.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Dubeck, D. v. Dubeck, F.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2023 · confidence medium
Foster Co., 710 A.2d 54, 54 (Pa. 1998); Pa.R.C.P. 227.1.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Glover, R. v. The Children's Hosp. of Phila.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2022 · confidence medium
Foster Co., 710 A.2d 54, 54 (Pa. 1998) (stating “Pa.R.Civ.P. 227.1 requires parties to file post-trial motions in order to preserve issues for appeal[,]” and reversing this Court’s order that reviewed appellant’s issues where appellant did not file post-trial motions, but instead, assuming trial court’s opinion was final order, filed notice of appeal); Krystal Development Corp. v. Rose, 704 A.2d 1102, 1103 (Pa. Super. 1997) (if no post-trial motions filed after nonjury trial, no issues preserved for appellate review).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Andrien, L. v. Gerber, H.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2022 · confidence medium
Foster Co., 710 A.2d 54, 54 (Pa. 1998)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Nattiel, M. v. Presbyterian Children's Village
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · confidence medium
Foster Co., 710 A.2d 54, 54 (Pa. 1998) (citations omitted) (“If an issue has not been raised in a post-trial motion, it is waived for appeal purposes.”).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Cruz, Y. v. Jewish Employ. & Vocational Services
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · confidence medium
Foster Co., 710 A.2d 54, 54 (1998) (stating unequivocally that “[Rule] 227.1 requires parties to file post-trial motions in order to preserve issues for appeal.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Chestnut Ridge Group v. Progressive Plastics
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2017 · confidence medium
Foster Co., 551 Pa. 306 , 710 A.2d 54 (1998), Rule 227.1 “requires parties to file post-trial motions in order to preserve issues for appeal,” and “[i]f an issue has not been raised in a post-trial motion, it is waived for appeal purposes.” Id. at 54.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Maione, A. v. Greenway Center, Inc.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2017 · confidence medium
Foster Co., 710 A.2d 54, 54 (Pa. 1998) (per curiam) (citations omitted).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Board of Supervisors v. Main Line Gardens, Inc.
Pa. · 2017 · confidence medium
Foster Co., 551 Pa. 306 , 710 A.2d 54 (1998), Rule 227.1 “requires parties to file post-trial motions in order to preserve issues for appeal,” and “[i]f an issue has not been raised in a post-trial motion, it is waived for appeal purposes.” Id. at 54.
cited Cited as authority (rule) D.L. Forrey & Associates, Inc. v. Fuel City Truck Stop, Inc.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2013 · confidence medium
Foster Co., 551 Pa. 306 , 710 A.2d 54, 54 (1998). [[Image here]] In light of ...
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Lenhart v. Cigna Companies
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2003 · confidence medium
Foster Co., 551 Pa. 306 , 710 A.2d 54, 54 (1998). ¶ 12 The relevant provisions of Pa. R.C.P. 227.4 provide as follows: In addition to the provisions of any Rule of Civil Procedure or Act of Assembly authorizing the prothonotary to enter judgment upon praecipe of a party, the prothonotary shall, upon praecipe of a party: (1) enter judgment upon the verdict of a jury or the decision of a judge following a trial without jury, or enter the decree nisi as the final decree, if (a) no timely post-trial motion is filed Pa.R.C.P. 227.4(l)(a). ¶ 13 In Shonberger v. Oswell, 365 Pa.Super. 481 , 530 A.2d…
cited Cited as authority (rule) Terwilliger v. Kitchen
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2001 · confidence medium
Foster Co., 551 Pa. 306, 306 , 710 A.2d 54, 54 (1998).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Chalkey v. Roush (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2000 · confidence medium
Lane Enterprises, supra at 306, 710 A.2d at 54-55. ¶ 5 Shortly after the supreme court decided Lane Enterprises , a panel of this court addressed a motion to quash filed in response to an appeal from a judgment following a non-jury trial in an action to recover attorney's fees.
discussed Cited "see" Kollias, P. v. Chriskoll, Inc. (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lane, 710 A.2d at 54 .6 ____________________________________________ 5 Chriskoll did not, in a reply brief or otherwise, respond to K & C’s waiver argument.
cited Cited "see" Diamond Reo Truck Co. v. Mid-Pacific Industries, Inc.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2002 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lane Enterprises, Inc., 710 A.2d at 54 and L.B.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
LANE ENTERPRISES, INC., Petitioner,
v.
L.B. FOSTER COMPANY, Respondent
0712 W.D. Allocatur Docket 1997.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Apr 15, 1998.
710 A.2d 54
1998 Pa. LEXIS 797
John B. Consevage, Harrisburg, for petitioner.
Cited by 60 opinions  |  Published
2 passages pin-cited by 3 cases
Pinpoint authority: #22,309 of 633,719
Citer courts: Superior Court of Pennsylvania (2) · Philadelphia County Court of C… (1)

AND NOW, this 15th day of April, 1998, the Order of the Superior Court is reversed. Pa.R.Civ.P. 227.1 requires parties to file post-trial motions in order to preserve issues for appeal. If an issue has not been raised in a post-trial motion, it is waived for appeal purposes. See Benson v. Penn Central Transportation Company, 463 Pa. 37, 342 A.2d 393 (1975) and Commonwealth v. Metz, 534 Pa. 341, 633 A.2d 125 (1993).

This matter is remanded to the trial court for reinstatement of the verdict.