discussed Cited "see" State v. Hernandez (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g." Although “R[uleJ 3:21-8 expresses the public policy of the State and should be liberally construed,” State v. Beatty, 128 N.J.Super. 488, 491 , 320 A.2d 514 (App.Div.1974), New Jersey courts have interpreted the Rule to allow jail credits only for “such confinement as is attributable to the arrest or other detention resulting from the particular offense.” State v. Black, 153 N.J. 438, 456 , 710 A.2d 428 (1998)(internal quotations and citation omitted); accord State v. Hemphill, 391 N.J.Super. 67, 70 , 917 A.2d 247 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 192 N.J. 68 , 926 A.2d 853 (2007); State v. …

discussed Cited "see" State v. Calcano See State v. Tuthill, 389 N.J.Super. 144, 149-50 , 912 A. 2d 146 (App.Div. 2006), certif. denied, 192 N.J. 69 , 926 A. 2d 853 (2007) (citing a collection of out-of-state cases where the modification did not substantially increase the risk of defendant's nonappearance and so the surety's obligations under the bail bonds were not discharged).