Hart v. Arnold, 897 A.2d 458 (Pa. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Hart v. Arnold, 897 A.2d 458 (Pa. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 7× by 7 distinct cases, 2008–2019 · …the trial court's findings are especially binding on appeal, where they are based upon the credibility of the witnesses, unless it appears that the court abused its discretion or that the court's findings lack evidentiary support or that the court capriciously disbelieved the ev… ⚠ not in text Topic ↗
97 citation events (97 in the last 25 years) across 9 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Delaware Co. Solid Waste Auth. v. Evergreen Comm. (pasuperct, 2022-04-27)
Treatment trajectory · 2006 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2006 2016 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Delaware Co. Solid Waste Auth. v. Evergreen Comm.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2022 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hart v. Arnold, 884 A.2d 316, 332 (Pa. Super. 2005), appeal denied, 897 A.2d 458 (Pa. 2006).
cited Cited "see" Schluth, W. v. Krishavtar, Inc.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hart v. Arnold, 884 A.2d 316, 332 (Pa. Super. 2005), appeal denied, 897 A.2d 458 (Pa. 2006).
discussed Cited "see" Perkins, T. v. Venezia Enterprises
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2018 · signal: accord · confidence high
The critical conceptual distinction between a breach of contract claim and a tort claim is that the former arises out of breaches of duties imposed by mutual consensus agreements between particular individuals, while the latter arises out of breaches of duties imposed by law as a matter of social policy. - 14 - J-A12021-18 Reardon, 926 A.2d at 486-87 (internal citation and quotations omitted); accord Hart v. Arnold, 884 A.2d 316, 339-340 (Pa. Super. 2005), appeal denied, 897 A.2d 458 (Pa. 2006).
discussed Cited "see" Murray, H. v. Willistown Township (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2017 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Hart v. Arnold, 884 A.2d 316, 334-35 (Pa. Super. 2005), (discussing impracticability of performance), appeal denied, 587 Pa. 695 , 897 A.2d 458 (2006). 13 In this situation too, the Second Restatement provides that a remedy akin to reformation is permissible to avoid injustice.
cited Cited "see" B.G. Balmer & Co. v. Frank Crystal & Co.
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2016 · signal: accord · confidence high
Reardon, 926 A.2d at 486-87 (internal citation and quotations omitted) (emphasis added); accord Hart v. Arnold, 884 A.2d 316, 339-40 (Pa.Super.2005), appeal denied, 687 Pa. 695 , 897 A.2d 458 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" Olympus Corp. v. Canady (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2008 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hart v. Arnold, 884 A.2d 316, 342 (Pa.Super.2005), appeal denied, 587 Pa. 695 , 897 A.2d 458 (2006).
discussed Cited "see" Trombetta v. Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. (2×)
Pa. Super. Ct. · 2006 · signal: see · confidence high
See Hart v. Arnold, 884 A.2d 316, 332 (Pa.Super.2005), appeal denied, 587 Pa. 695 , 897 A.2d 458 (2006) (citations omitted).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HART
v.
ARNOLD[113].
904 MAL (2005).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Mar 22, 2006.
897 A.2d 458
Cited by 47 opinions  |  Published

Disposition of petition for allowance of appeal denied.

113 Justice BALDWIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.