green
Positive treatment
Issue: accrual claimNJ ↗
Issue: claimant motionNJ ↗
Quoted verbatim 1×
7.5 score
“delay will not generally affect the validity of an administrative determination, particularly where no prejudice is shown.”
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Pepe
(2×)
delay will not generally affect the validity of an administrative determination, particularly where no prejudice is shown.
discussed
Cited "see"
Miller v. Moredock
(2×)
See In re Garber, 141 N.J.Super. 87 , 357 A2d 297, 299 , certif. denied, 71 N.J. 494 , 366 A.2d 650 (1976) (Twelve-month delay between hearing officer’s findings and recommendations following driver’s license suspension hearing and final decision adopting and affirming same was upheld where driver made no showing of prejudice.); Board of Educ. v. Donaldson, 41 A.D.3d 1138 , 839 N.Y.S.2d 558, 561 (2007) (“Although petitioner claims that the [ten-year] delay caused it substantial prejudice, the mere passage of time in rendering an administrative determination will not, standing alone, just…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In Re: Bernard Garber
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Sep 20, 1976.
Published
Citer courts: New Jersey Superior Court App … (1)
Petition for certification denied. (See 141 N. J. Super. 87)