In Re Garber, 366 A.2d 650 (N.J. 1976). · Go Syfert
In Re Garber, 366 A.2d 650 (N.J. 1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“delay will not generally affect the validity of an administrative determination, particularly where no prejudice is shown.”
14 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Pepe (njsuperctappdiv, 2005-08-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) State v. Pepe (2×)
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 2005 · signal: see also · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
delay will not generally affect the validity of an administrative determination, particularly where no prejudice is shown.
discussed Cited "see" Miller v. Moredock (2×)
W. Va. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Garber, 141 N.J.Super. 87 , 357 A2d 297, 299 , certif. denied, 71 N.J. 494 , 366 A.2d 650 (1976) (Twelve-month delay between hearing officer’s findings and recommendations following driver’s license suspension hearing and final decision adopting and affirming same was upheld where driver made no showing of prejudice.); Board of Educ. v. Donaldson, 41 A.D.3d 1138 , 839 N.Y.S.2d 558, 561 (2007) (“Although petitioner claims that the [ten-year] delay caused it substantial prejudice, the mere passage of time in rendering an administrative determination will not, standing alone, just…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In Re: Bernard Garber
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Sep 20, 1976.
366 A.2d 650
1976 N.J. LEXIS 854

Petition for certification denied. (See 141 N. J. Super. 87)