Orthodox Jewish Council of Baltimore, Inc. v. Abramson, 791 A.2d 129 (Md. 2002). · Go Syfert
Search
Orthodox Jewish Council of Baltimore, Inc. v. Abramson, 791 A.2d 129 (Md. 2002). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
85 citation events (85 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Castruccio v. Estate of Castruccio (md, 2017-08-26)
Treatment trajectory · 2002 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2002 2014 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (rule) Castruccio v. Estate of Castruccio (8×) also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
Md. · 2017 · confidence medium
In this case, the circuit court did not err in finding “sufficient evidence from the document and/or surrounding circumstances to make a prima facie case for the satisfaction of the statutory requirements for execution of a will,” id. at 157, 73 A.3d 374 , and thus properly found that the presumption of due execution attached to the 2010 Will.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Whitley v. Maryland State Board of Elections (2×)
Md. · 2012 · confidence medium
Second, although the underlying purpose of the signature requirement in both the wills and voter petition contexts is the prevention of fraud, see Slack v. Truitt, 368 Md. 2, 12-13 , 791 A.2d 129, 135 (2002) (noting that the presence of the signatures on a will creates a presumption of validity); Md.Code (2002, 2010 Repl.Vol.), Election Law Article, § 6-204(b), there is an additional safeguard present in the referendum context.
examined Cited "see" Castruccio v. Estate of Castruccio (3×)
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See Slack v. Truitt, 368 Md. 2, 12 , 791 A.2d 129 (2002).
examined Cited "see" Groat v. Sundberg (3×)
Md. Ct. Spec. App. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See Slack, 368 Md. at 8 , 791 A.2d 129 ; see also Bowe & Parker, supra, § 29.16, at 435 and n. 8 (3d ed.1961) (noting that in Maryland and other jurisdictions, “the proponents are bound to make out a prima facie case of execution, and when they have done so, the burden is upon the contestants to rebut such prima facie case”).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The ORTHODOX JEWISH COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, INC. Et Al.
v.
Barry Ephraim ABRAMSON Et Ux.
118, Sept. Term, 2001.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
Feb 8, 2002.
791 A.2d 129
2002 Md. LEXIS 47
Elizabeth Sarah Gere (Ross, Dixon & Bell), of Washington, D.C., for Petitioners., Thomas A. Bowden (Kollman & Saucier, P.A.), of Baltimore, for Respondents.
Submitted to Bell.
Cited by 5 opinions  |  Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Court having considered and granted the petition for writ of certiorari in the above-captioned case, it is this 8th day of February, 2002,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the appeal be, and it is hereby, dismissed. See Dennis v. Folken-berg, 354 Md. 412, 731 A.2d 883 (1999); Samuels v. Tschechte-lin, 353 Md. 508, 727 A.2d 929 (1999); Shoemaker v. Smith, 353 Md. 143, 725 A.2d 549 (1999); Bunting v. State, 312 Md. 472, 540 A.2d 805 (1988). Costs to be paid by petitioners.