green
Positive treatment
Issue: waiver of sovereign immunityMO ↗
Issue: sovereign immunityMO ↗
Issue: exception to sovereign immunityMO ↗
Quoted verbatim 1×
46.7 score
G Cite
cited 5× by 4 distinct cases, 2021–2024 · 2 courts ·
…the plaintiff shoulders the burden of proving the existence of an insurance policy and that the terms of the policy cover the plaintiff's claim.
at p. 415
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009
2017
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
State of Missouri, ex rel., The School District of Kansas City 33 v. The Honorable Jerri J. Zhang
(3×)
also: Cited as authority (rule)
the extent of the waiver of sovereign immunity is expressly dictated, and limited, by the terms of the insurance policy
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Brian Smith v. Justin Lee, et al.
Mo. 2015) (citing Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 415 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)).“Because the liability of a public entity for torts is the exception to the general rule of sovereign immunity, a plaintiff must specifically plead facts demonstrating that the claim is within an exception to sovereign immunity.” Id. (citing Epps v. City of Pine Lawn, 353 F.3d 588, 594 (8th Cir. 2003)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Sandra Lynn Hemme v. The City of St. Joseph, Missouri, et al.
Mo. 2015) (citing Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 415 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Matthew McNealy v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al.
Dist., 491 S.W.3d 628, 635 (Mo. App. 2016) (quoting Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 415 (Mo. App. 2008)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Berry v. Missouri Department of Corrections Women's Eastern Reception, Diagnostic and Corrections Center
See also Epps v. City of Pine Lawn, 353 F.3d 588, 594 (8th Cir. 2003) (plaintiff must demonstrate existence of insurance “that covered the plaintiff’s claim”); Jiang, 156 F. Supp. 3d at 1007 (citing Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 415 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Varela v. Hill
Louis, 636 S.W.3d 889 , 900 (Mo. Ct. App. 2021) (citing Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 415 (Mo. App. 2008); Brennan ex rel.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Brandy v. City of Saint Louis, Missouri
Dist., 491 S.W.3d 628, 635 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016)) (citing Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 415 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)); Brennan By & Through Brennan v. Curators of the Univ. of Mo., 942 S.W.2d 432, 436-37 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997)).
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Cassandra Cox v. Callaway County Sheriff's Department
(3×)
Dist. v. Grate, 576 S.W.3d 262, 269 (Mo. App. W.D. 2019) (quoting Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 415 (Mo. App. E.D. 2008)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Biggs v. City of Maryland Heights
(2×)
Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 415 (Mo.App.2008).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Washington v. St. Louis, Missouri, City of
(2×)
Louis, 636 S.W.3d 889 , 900 (Mo. Ct. App. 2021) (quoting Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 415 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Kristine Hendrix v. City of St. Louis
“We will construe 12 any such waiver narrowly; that is, the extent of the waiver is ‘expressly dictated, and limited, by the terms of the insurance policy.’” Id. (quoting Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 415 (Mo. App. E.D. 2008)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Blakeney v. City of Pine Lawn, Missouri
In Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 412 (Mo. App. 2008), for example, the Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed that the defendant city’s MOPERM policy (identical to the policy here) did not waive sovereign immunity for the plaintiff's whistleblower retaliation claims.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Brenda Estes, As Guardian and Next Friend for Jane Doe v. The Board of Trustees of The Missouri Public Entity Risk Management Fund In Their Official Capacities
(2×)
Fund, 358 S.W.3d 177, 182 (Mo. App. W.D. 2012) (In rejecting a third party claimant's contention that MOPERM is a public entity, rather than an insurance company, our Court stated that MOPERM's "coverage of public entities is similar to, if not indistinguishable from, the coverage that insurers provide to insureds." (citing section 537.705.1)); Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 415-18 (Mo. App. E.D. 2008) (treating MOPERM memorandum of coverage as a contract of insurance subject to interpretation by applying traditional rules of contract construction); Charles Maggard Agency…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Johnson v. City of Leadington
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
To qualify for the insurance exception in particular, Plaintiff “shoulders the burden of proving the existence of an insurance policy, and that the terms of the policy cover [her] claims.” Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 415 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Blakeney v. City of Pine Lawn, Missouri
The insurance exception to sovereign immunity is quite narrow, the extent of which is “expressly dictated, and limited, by the terms of the insurance policy.” Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 415 (Mo. App. E.D. 2008).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State ex rel. Blue Springs School District v. The Honorable Jack R. Grate
"The plaintiff shoulders the burden of proving the existence of an insurance policy, and that the terms of the policy cover the claims asserted by the plaintiff against the [political subdivision]." Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 415 (Mo. App. E.D. 2008).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
A.F., by and through her next friend L.F. v. Hazelwood School District, Brenda Rone and Elizabeth Brands
We will construe any such waiver narrowly; that is, the extent of the waiver is “expressly dictated, and limited, by the terms of the insurance policy.” Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 415 (Mo.App.E.D.2008).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Jiang v. Porter
Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 415 (Mo.Ct.App.2008).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Lisa Armbruster v. Mercy Medical Group
Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 416 (Mo, App. E.D, 2008).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Armbruster v. Mercy Medical Group
Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 416 (Mo.App.E.D.2008).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Stephens v. Dunn
Because “finding a municipality liable for torts is the exception to the general rule of sovereign immunity, a plaintiff must plead with specificity facts demonstrating his claim falls within an exception to sovereign immunity.” Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 415 (Mo.App.E.D.2008) (internal quotation and citation omitted).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
SHERI STEPHENS v. SHERIFF W. ARCHIE DUNN, SHERIFF JACK L. MERRITT, RETIRED, C.E. WELLS, JOHN DOE I, JOHN DOE III, and JOHN DOE IV, Defendants/Respondents, and GERALD TUCK, JOHN DOE II, JOHN DOE V, and JOHN B. FREITAS, DO
Because “finding a municipality liable for torts is the exception to the general rule of sovereign immunity, a plaintiff must plead with specificity facts demonstrating his claim falls within an exception to sovereign immunity.” Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 415 (Mo.App.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
White v. City of Ladue
Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 414 (Mo.App.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Sexton v. City of Hannibal
Sexton’s argument that the “Employment Practices Liability Coverage” section of the MIRMA plan waives the City’s sovereign immunity with regard to Count III is foreclosed by Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 415 (Mo.Ct.App.2008), which held that such a provision does not override a provision in the same policy stating that the policy is not meant to constitute a waiver of sovereign immunity.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Vaughn v. GENASCI
Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 415 (Mo.App.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Hendricks v. CURATORS OF UNIV. OF MISSOURI
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 416 (Mo.App.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bennartz v. City of Columbia
(2×)
Id. at 559 . 5 Similarly, in Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, the plaintiff, a former City Clerk, reported “ ‘inappropriate and unethical business practices and violations of policies and procedures’” by the City of Country Club Hills. 272 S.W.3d 409, 412 (Mo.App.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Wright v. City of Salisbury, Mo.
Topps v. City of County Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 414 (Mo.Ct.App.2008) (quoting Kunzie v. City of Olivette, 184 S.W.3d 570, 574 (Mo.2006)); Junior Coll.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Maritz Holdings, Inc. v. Federal Insurance Co.
In determining whether an ambiguity exists, we must give words their “plain and ordinary meaning as understood by a reasonable, average person.” Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 416 (Mo.App.
cited
Cited "see"
Becker v. Allied Property & Casualty Insurance Co.
See Topps v. City of Country Club Hills, 272 S.W.3d 409, 418 (Mo.App.E.D.2008).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rick E. SIMMONS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent
v.
STATE of Missouri, Respondent
WD 68429.
Missouri Court of Appeals.
Nov 18, 2008.
R. Gregory Harrison, Liberty, MO, for appellant., Shaun J. Mackelprang, Mary H. Moore, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Div I: Holliger, P.J., Hardwick and Welsh.
Published
Order
PER CURIAM.Rick Simmons appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. He contends the circuit court erred in refusing to vacate his second-degree assault conviction based on ineffective assistance of counsel. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment. Rule 84.16(b).