Halpin v. Town of Lancaster, 855 N.E.2d 1169 (N.Y. 2006). · Go Syfert
Search
Halpin v. Town of Lancaster, 855 N.E.2d 1169 (N.Y. 2006). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Marcia M. Halpin, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of Samantha Halpin and Another, Infants, Appellant,
v.
Town of Lancaster, Respondent
New York Court of Appeals.
Sep 14, 2006.
Published opinion
855 N.E.2d 1169
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Magavern, Magavern & Grimm, L.L.P., Buffalo {Aven Rennie of counsel), for appellant., Cohen & Lombardo, EC., Buffalo {Christopher M. Duggan of counsel), for respondent.
Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith Concur in Memorandum.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with[*828] costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. The courts below properly concluded that plaintiff failed to state causes of action for breach of a special duty and breach of a duty voluntarily assumed. Absent proof of a special relationship, police, in dealing with domestic quarrels, “cannot be expected to predict and prevent irrational behavior” (Yearwood v Town of Brighton, 101 AD2d 498, 502 [4th Dept 1984] [op by Hancock, Jr., J.], affd for reasons stated below 64 NY2d 667 [1984]).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo, Read and R.S. Smith concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, etc.