In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Seiler, 586 N.W.2d 584 (Minn. 1998). · Go Syfert
Search
In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against Seiler, 586 N.W.2d 584 (Minn. 1998). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Lynch v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. (minnctapp, 2000-07-03)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Lynch v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
Minn. Ct. App. · 2000 · confidence medium
Co., 586 N.W.2d 584, 585 (Minn.App.1998), argue that even in the absence of a specific exclusion, a claimant cannot collect first-party benefits under a policy covering the at-fault driver because that would be equivalent to an improper conversion.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In Re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Victor P. SEILER, an Attorney at Law of the State of Minnesota
C3-96-2033.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Dec 14, 1998.
586 N.W.2d 584
Alan.
Published

ORDER

Upon the request of the Director of Lawyers Professional Responsibility for an order dismissing the pending petition for revocation of probation and for further disciplinary action in this matter without costs,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for revocation of probation and for further disciplinary action against Victor P. Seiler is hereby dismissed without costs.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Alan C. Page Associate Justice