Adimey v. Erie Cnty. Indus. Dev. Agency, 675 N.E.2d 459 (N.Y. 1996). · Go Syfert
Search
Adimey v. Erie Cnty. Indus. Dev. Agency, 675 N.E.2d 459 (N.Y. 1996). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Herkimer County Indus. Dev. Agency v. Village of Herkimer (nyappdiv, 2019-08-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Herkimer County Indus. Dev. Agency v. Village of Herkimer
N.Y. App. Div. · 2019 · confidence medium
Agency , 89 NY2d 836, 838 [1996], mod for the reasons stated in dissenting in part mem 226 AD2d 1053 [4th Dept 1996]; cf. Matter of Erie County Indus.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
George Adimey Et Al., Appellants,
v.
Erie County Industrial Development Agency, Respondent
New York Court of Appeals.
Nov 19, 1996.
675 N.E.2d 459
1996 N.Y. LEXIS 5005
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL, Paul William Beltz, P. C, Buffalo (Catherine M. Beltz of counsel), for appellants., Smith, Murphy & Schoepperle, LLP, Buffalo (Frank G. Godson and Lynn D. Gates of counsel), for respondent.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order modified, without costs, by reinstating plaintiff’s Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action and, as so modified, affirmed, for the reasons stated in the dissenting in part memorandum at the Appellate Division (226 AD2d 1053).

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine and Ciparick.