green
Positive treatment
6.4 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Boroski v. DynCorp Intern.
See Price v. Stevedoring Servs. of Am., Inc., 627 F.3d 1145 (9th Cir.2011) (O'Scannlain, J., concurring specially), rehearing en banc granted, 653 F.3d 928, 929 (2011).
cited
Cited "see"
Boroski v. Dyncorp International
See Price v. Stevedoring Servs. of Am., Inc., 627 F.3d 1145 (9th Cir.2011) (O’Scannlain, L, concurring specially), rehearing en banc granted, 653 F.3d 928, 929 (2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Arel PRICE, Petitioner,
v.
STEVEDORING SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC.; Eagle Pacific Insurance Company; Homeport Insurance Co.; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, Respondents
v.
STEVEDORING SERVICES OF AMERICA, INC.; Eagle Pacific Insurance Company; Homeport Insurance Co.; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, Respondents
08-71719.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Aug 1, 2011.
Charles Robinowitz, Portland, OR, for Petitioner., Russell A. Metz, Metz & Associates P.S., Seattle, WA, for Respondents.
Kozinski.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.