Blanco v. United States, 184 F.2d 117 (9th Cir. 1950). · Go Syfert
Search
Blanco v. United States, 184 F.2d 117 (9th Cir. 1950). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Monge v. Smyth, 198 F.2d 749 (9th Cir. 1952)
Treatment trajectory · 1950 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1950 1988 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases2 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Blanco
v.
United States
12508.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Aug 17, 1950.
Published opinion
184 F.2d 117
1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3048
L. Charles Gay, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant., Frank J. Hennessy, U. S. Atty., Rudolph J. Scholz, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Mathews, Steppiens, Orr.
Cited by 8 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an o'rder which granted a motion to dismiss an action, but did not dismiss it. Such an order is not a[*118] final decision, within the meaning of 28 U. S.C.A.. § 1291, and is not appealable. Prickett v. Consolidated Liquidating Corp., 9 Cir., 180 F.2d 8; Turnbull v. Cyr, 9 Cir., 184 F.2d 117. See, also, City and County of San Francisco v. McLaughlin, 9 Cir., 9 F.2d 390; Wright v. Gibson, 9 Cir., 128 F. 2d 865; Tee-Hit-Ton Tribe of Tlingit Indians etc., v. Olson, 9 Cir., 144 F.2d 347; Peoples Bank v. Federal Reserve Bank, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d 850; Cashion v. Bunn, 9 Cir., 149 F.2d 969. The appeal is, therefore, dismissed. Mandate to issue forthwith.