Rubino v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue (Two Cases), 186 F.2d 304 (9th Cir. 1951). · Go Syfert
Rubino v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue (Two Cases), 186 F.2d 304 (9th Cir. 1951). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
34 citation events across 8 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Grant v. Commissioner (tax, 1963-06-11)
Treatment trajectory · 1951 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1951 1988 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Grant v. Commissioner
Tax Ct. · 1963 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rubino v. Commissioner, 186 F. 2d 304 (affirming a Memorandum Opinion of this Court), certiorari denied 342 U.S. 814 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rubino
v.
Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Two Cases)
12536_1.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Feb 8, 1951.
186 F.2d 304
Cited by 4 opinions  |  Published

186 F.2d 304

RUBINO
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (two cases).

No. 12535.

No. 12536.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

January 2, 1951.

Rehearing Denied February 8, 1951.

Wareham C. Seaman, Stockton, Cal., for petitioners.

Thereon Lamar Caudle, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, L. W. Post, Spc. Assts. to Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before STEPHENS and HEALY, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

1

These cases are here on petition to review a decision of the Tax Court relating to a deficiency assessment. The Commissioner had determined that the property involved, namely, a number of houses constructed by the petitioners, were held by the latter primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of trade or business within the meaning of § 117(j) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 117(j) (1), hence the profit from the sale is taxable as ordinary income. Petitioners' argument is that the property was held primarily for rental purposes, and that the gains from the sales should be treated as long-term capital gains. The Tax Court made findings resolving the dispute in favor of the Commissioner's determination.

2

The issue is essentially one of fact. We see no clear error in the Court's finding, and its judgment is accordingly affirmed.