Hoffman v. State, 38 A.3d 1254 (Del. 2012). · Go Syfert
Search
Hoffman v. State, 38 A.3d 1254 (Del. 2012). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
59 citation events (59 in the last 25 years) across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Ayers (delsuperct, 2025-04-03)
Treatment trajectory · 2012 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2012 2019 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) State v. Ayers
Del. Super. Ct. · 2025 · confidence medium
Finally, the Supreme Court has specifically rejected the concept of “equitable tolling” in the face of late pro se inmate pleadings.30 After considering the argument, the Supreme Court spoke with refreshing clarity: “The doctrine of equitable tolling is inapplicable to a motion for postconviction relief.”31 There is no “mailbox rule” for inmate pleadings in Delaware.32 There is no equitable tolling of the Rule 61 deadline for filing.33 Rule 61 itself has no applicable 29 See, e.g., Foster v. State, 38 A.3d 1254, 1254 (Del. 2012). 30 “[I]t is settled law that the equitable tolling…
cited Cited "see, e.g." My Size, Inc. v. Mizrahi
D. Del. · 2016 · signal: see also · confidence low
Mgmt., L.P., 831 A.2d 318, 330 (Del.Ch.2003); see also Hartsel v. Vanguard Grp., Inc., 2011 WL 2421003 , at *10 (Del.Ch.2011) aff'd, 38 A.3d 1254 (Del.2012).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
HOFFMAN
v.
STATE.
540, 2011.
Supreme Court of Delaware.
Mar 2, 2012.
38 A.3d 1254
2012 WL 689165
Published

DECISION WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINION

Affirmed.