State v. Read, 33 A.3d 740 (Conn. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Read, 33 A.3d 740 (Conn. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Mangual (conn, 2014-03-04)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Mangual
Conn. · 2014 · signal: see · confidence high
Although this court has not been called on to decide whether the totality of the circumstances surrounding the execution of a search warrant at a suspect’s home rendered the atmo- sphere police-dominated for purposes of Miranda, the Appellate Court has addressed that issue; see State v. Read, 132 Conn. App. 17 , 20–23, 29 A.3d 919 , cert. denied, 303 Conn. 916 , 33 A.3d 740 (2011); and we pre- viously have considered whether a suspect was in cus- tody when he invited the police into his home and willingly agreed to speak to them.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Kelly
Conn. · 2014 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ed. 2d 299 (2005) (reasonable to handcuff defendant for two to three hours during execution of search warrant); see also State v. Read, 132 Conn. App. 17, 21 , 29 A.3d 919 (execution of search warrant lasted approximately eight to ten hours), cert. denied, 303 Conn. 916 , 33 A.3d 740 (2011).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Richard D. Read
Not in source.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 15, 2011.
33 A.3d 740
2011 WL 7037096
2011 Conn. LEXIS 520
G. Douglas Nash, assigned counsel, in support of the petition., Bruce R. Lockwood, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
Norcott.
Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 132 Conn. App. 17 (AC 32972), is denied.

NORCOTT, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.