Stevens v. Jackson, 31 A.3d 656 (Pa. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
Stevens v. Jackson, 31 A.3d 656 (Pa. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Paul STEVENS, Respondent
v.
Lisa JACKSON and Thomas Luther, Petitioners
340 MAL 2011.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Nov 9, 2011.
31 A.3d 656
2011 Pa. LEXIS 2700
Per Curiam.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 9th day of November, 2011, Petitioners’ Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, and the Superior Court’s order quashing Petitioners’ appeal is VACATED. This matter is REMANDED for the Superior Court to consider the substance of Petitioners’ appeal. Estoppel is at issue in this case. The fact that genetic testing has occurred has not mooted out that issue; genetic testing does not resolve estoppel issues, and the estoppel issue is still being contested by the parties. Estoppel issues arising in paternity testing cases are immediately appealable. See Jones v. Trojak, 535 Pa. 95, 634 A.2d 201 (1993) and Freedman v. McCandless, 539 Pa. 584, 654 A.2d 529 (1995). Under this authority, parties are not constrained to wait until they file an appeal regarding a custody order to raise an estoppel argument.

Jurisdiction relinquished.