Holmin v. TRW, INC., 770 A.2d 283 (N.J. 2001). · Go Syfert
Search
Holmin v. TRW, INC., 770 A.2d 283 (N.J. 2001). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
38 citation events (38 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Zacharias v. WHATMAN PLC (njsuperctappdiv, 2001-11-21)
Treatment trajectory · 2001 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2001 2013 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Zacharias v. WHATMAN PLC (2×)
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 2001 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Holmin v. TRW, Inc., 330 N.J.Super. 30, 35-36 , 748 A. 2d 1141 (App.Div. 2000), aff'd o.b., 167 N.J. 205 , 770 A. 2d 283 (2001).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ralph W. HOLMIN, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
TRW, INC., Defendant-Appellant, and Carmine COPPOLA, Ruth E. Miller, Arthur B. Branstine and Synnex Information Technologies, Inc., Defendants.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
May 9, 2001.
770 A.2d 283
Per Curiam.
Published

Scott J. Wenner, a member of the New York bar, argued the cause for appellant (Littler Mendelson, attorneys; Mr. Wenner, New York City, Stefanie W. Kohen and William P. McLane, Morristown, on the briefs).

[*284] David J. Gruber, Livingston, argued the cause for respondent (Lehman, Lehman & Gruber, attorneys).

Jon W. Green, Springfield, argued the cause for amicus curiae, National Employment Lawyers Association of New Jersey (Deutsch Resnick Green & Gramigna, attorneys).

PER CURIAM

The judgment is affirmed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Lesemann's opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 330 N.J.Super. 30, 748 A.2d 1141 (2000).

For affirmance—Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices STEIN, COLEMAN, LONG, VERNIERO, LaVECCHIA and ZAZZALI—7.

Opposed—none.