State v. Figueroa, 241 P.3d 182 (N.M. 2010). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Figueroa, 241 P.3d 182 (N.M. 2010). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
41 citation events (41 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Treatment trajectory · 2010 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2010 2018 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Ramos
N.M. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Smile, 2009-NMCA-064, ¶ 8 , 146 N.M. 525 , 212 P.3d 413 , cert. quashed, 2010-NMCERT-006 , 148 N.M. 584 , 241 P.3d 182 .
cited Cited "see" State v. Ramos
N.M. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Smile, 2009-NMCA-064, ¶ 8 , 146 N.M. 525 , 212 P.3d 413 , cert. quashed, 2010-NMCERT-006 , 148 N.M. 584 , 241 P.3d 182 .
cited Cited "see" State v. Ramos
N.M. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Smile, 2009-NMCA-064, ¶ 8 , 146 N.M. 525 , 212 P.3d 413 , cert. quashed, 2010-NMCERT-006 , 148 N.M. 584 , 241 P.3d 182 .
cited Cited "see" State v. Ramos
N.M. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Smile, 2009-NMCA-064, ¶ 8 , 146 N.M. 525 , 212 P.3d 413 , cert. quashed, 2010-NMCERT-006 , 148 N.M. 584 , 241 P.3d 182 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. Garcia
N.M. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Smile, 2009-NMCA-064, ¶ 39 , 146 N.M. 525 , 212 P.3d 413 , cert. quashed, 2010-NMCERT-006 , 148 N.M. 584 , 241 P.3d 182 ; see also Rule 12-216 NMRA (“To preserve a question for review it must appear that a ruling or decision by the district court was fairly invoked, but formal exceptions are not required[.]”).
discussed Cited "see" State v. Garcia
N.M. Ct. App. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Smile, 2009-NMCA-064, ¶ 39 , 146 N.M. 525 , 212 P.3d 413 , cert. quashed, 2010-NMCERT-006 , 148 N.M. 584 , 241 P.3d 182 ; see also Rule 12-216 NMRA (“To preserve a question for review it must appear that a ruling or decision by the district court was fairly invoked, but formal exceptions are not required[.]”). {9} The State also contends that because contents of the interview were admitted only through the testimony of the State’s witnesses and Defendant, and no portion of the written transcript itself was actually introduced into evidence, the rule of completeness does not…
discussed Cited "see" State v. Garcia
N.M. Ct. App. · 2013 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Smile, 2009-NMCA-064, ¶ 39 , 146 N.M. 525 , 212 P.3d 413 , cert. quashed, 2010-NMCERT-006 , 148 N.M. 584 , 241 P.3d 182 ; see also Rule 12-216 NMRA (“To preserve a question for review it must appear that a ruling or decision by the district court was fairly invoked, but formal exceptions are not required[.]”). {9} The State also contends that because contents of the interview were admitted only through the testimony of the State’s witnesses and Defendant, and no portion of the written transcript itself was actually introduced into evidence, the rule of completeness does not…
discussed Cited "see" State v. Johnson
N.M. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Nevarez, 2010-NMCA-049, ¶¶ 34-36 , 148 N.M. 820 , 242 15 P.3d 387 , cert. granted, 2010-NMCERT-006 , 148 N.M. 584 , 241 P.3d 182 ; State v. 16 Neal, 2008-NMCA-008, ¶ 29 , 143 N.M. 341 , 176 P.3d 330 ; State v. Soto, 2007- 17 NMCA-077, ¶ 34, 142 N.M. 32 , 162 P.3d 187 . 18 For the reasons stated herein and in the notice of proposed disposition, we 19 affirm. 5 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 MICHAEL D.
cited Cited "see" State v. Ramos
N.M. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Smile, 2009-NMCA- 17 064, ¶ 8, 146 N.M. 525 , 212 P.3d 413 , cert. quashed, 2010-NMCERT-006 , 148 N.M. 18 584, 241 P.3d 182 .
discussed Cited "see" Holguin v. SALLY BEAUTY SUPPLY INC.
N.M. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Smile, 2009-NMCA-064, ¶68 , 146 N.M. 525 , 212 P.3d 413 (Vigil, J., concurring in part, dissenting in part) (stating that the best evidence of intent is a defendant’s statement that he acted with the requisite intent), cert, quashed, 2010-NMCERT-006 , 148 N.M. 584 , 241 P.3d 182 .
discussed Cited "see" State v. Telles
N.M. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see · confidence high
See 3 generally State v. Harper, 2010-NMCA-055, ¶ 22 , 148 N.M. 286 , 235 P.3d 625 4 (observing that Rule 5-503 encompasses witness interviews, and characterizing the 5 facilitation of such interviews as a responsibility), cert. granted, 2010-NMCERT-006 , 6 148 N.M. 584 , 241 P.3d 182 ; cf. State v. Torres, 1999-NMSC-010, ¶ 10 , 127 N.M. 20 , 7 976 P.2d 20 (listing various factors to be taken into consideration).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State v. Olivas
N.M. Ct. App. · 2011 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., State v. Smile, 2009-NMCA-064, ¶ 27 , 146 N.M. 525 , 212 P.3d 413 , cert. quashed, 2010-NMCERT-006 , 148 N.M. 584 , 241 P.3d 182 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE
v.
FIGUEROA.
32,360.
New Mexico Supreme Court.
Jun 2, 2010.
241 P.3d 182
Published

Writ Granted.