State v. Ramirez, 2011 UT App 35 (Utah Ct. App. 2011). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Ramirez, 2011 UT App 35 (Utah Ct. App. 2011). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
Patrick Robert RAMIREZ, Defendant and Appellant
20090498-CA.
Court of Appeals of Utah.
Jan 27, 2011.
2011 UT App 35
Douglas D. Terry, St. George, for Appellant.
Davis, Mehugh, Thorne.
Published

DECISION

PER CURIAM:

T1 Appellant Patrick Robert Ramirez appeals his conviction and sentence. Ramireg's counsel filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 LEd.2d 498 (1967), and State v. Clayton, 639 P.2d 168 (Utah 1981). The brief "objectively demonstate[s] that the issues raised are frivolous." State v. Flores, 855 P.2d 258, 260 (Utah Ct.App.1993) (per curiam); see also Dunn v. Cook, 791 P.2d 873, 877 (Utah 1990) (stating that an Anders brief must demonstrate that any "potentially meritorious" issues are actually frivolous). Based upon our independent examination of the matter, we determine that the appeal is, indeed, wholly frivolous. Accordingly, we af[*419] firm the district court's decision and grant Appellant's counsel's request to withdraw.