green
Positive treatment
5.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lopez
See Villa v. City of Las Cruces, 2010-NMCA-099, ¶ 12 , 148 N.M. 668 , 241 P.3d 1108 (“Statutory construction calls for de novo review.”), cert, denied, 2010-NMCERT-009 , 149 N.M. 49 , 243 P.3d 753 . {10} In interpreting a statute, our primary objective is to give effect to the Legislature’s intent.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Herrera
See In re Adoption of Doe, 100 N.M. 764, 765 , 676 9 P.2d 1329 , 1330 (1984). 10 In addition, this Court has previously stated that “it is not the case, that anyone 11 whose testimony may be relevant in establishing the chain of custody, authenticity of 12 [a] sample, or accuracy of [a] testing device, must appear in person as part of the 13 prosecution’s case.” State v. Nez, 2010-NMCA-092, ¶ 8 , 148 N.M. 914 , 242 P.3d 14 753 , (internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied 2010-NMCERT-9, 149 N.M. 49 , 15 243 P.3d 481 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
CLARK
v.
ROMERO.
v.
ROMERO.
32,528.
New Mexico Supreme Court.
Sep 13, 2010.
Published
Denial of Certiorari.