green
Positive treatment
2.0 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Pena v. United States
Fiorentino v. United States, 226 F.2d 619, 621 (3d Cir.1955) (citing Monjar v. Higgins, 132 F.2d 990 (2d Cir.1943)).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
EMPIRE TRUST COMPANY v. United States
United States v. Wolf, 238 F.2d 447 (9 Cir. 1956); Fiorentino v. United States, 226 F.2d 619, 621 (3 Cir. 1955); Elbert v. Johnson, supra; Moir v. United States, supra at 460; City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. United States, 143 F.Supp. 921 (S.D.N.Y.1956); Bear Mill Mfg.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Charlie EVANS, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
12568_1.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Oct 19, 1955.
226 F.2d 619
Hodges & Doughty, Knoxville, Tenn., for appellant., John C. Crawford, Jr., James M. Meek, John F. Dugger, Knoxville, Tenn., for appellee.
Simons, Martin, Stewart.
Published
PER CURIAM.
On this appeal from the judgment entered on the verdict of á jury and the sentence pronounced thereon by the United States District Judge, the court having fully considered the record m the case and the oral arguments and briefs of attorneys for the government and appellant, respectively, has reached the conclusion that there was no error in the ruling of the district judge overruling the motion to suppress the evidence for the alleged reasons urged by appellant that the government agents entered his home and made a search for contraband liquor upon a void search warrant, or that the affidavit on which the search warrant was issued was insufficient to establish probable cause.
The judgment of conviction and sentence is affirmed.